Realtime hit counterweb stats

Teaching American History Grants

Four years ago I took part in an Advanced Placement program in preparation to teach the A.P. course in American history.  Since it was to be my first year teaching the A.P. course I was registered for the section geared to first-year teachers.  Without going into much detail the first day was an absolute nightmare.  While I anticipated a program that would introduce me to the A.P. curriculum the activities were centered entirely around content.  And when I say content, I mean basic content.  Before long I realized that most of the people in the room were not only unprepared to teach the A.P. course, they had no business stepping into a history classroom at all.  I met a number of teachers who were slated to teach the A.P. course as a first year teacher and did not even have a degree in history.  To make matters worse our instructor was much more interested in getting a laugh out of his audience than he was in imparting information. 

Luckily I ran into a few recent graduates of UVA’s Curry School of Education who also had history degrees under their belts.  We decided to approach the director of the program to see about switching into the advanced course.  At first our request was denied; however, after we threatened to leave and write letters to senior administrators our request was accepted.  I wish I could say the next two days were much better, but unfortunately, this was not the case.  While we didn’t have to worry about basic content much of the advanced course was devoted to analyzing documents and discussing concepts such as causation and perspective.  Of course, all of this is important, but as someone who had minimal training in historical studies it was incredibly boring and pretty much a waste of my time.  There was very little that these teachers were being trained to do for their A.P. courses that I was not already doing in my standard survey course. 

I don’t mean to simply toot my own horn, but to point out that history education is severely deficient in our society.  Public officials and various commentators give lip service to the importance of civics and history education, but when push comes to shove we fail to deliver the goods and instead blame (and even poke fun at) our students for what they don’t know.  I don’t have any answers other than to say we need to devote serious resources to educating our teachers.  

One promising recent development is the Teaching American History Grant Program which is a discretionary grant program funded under Title II-C, Subpart 4 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.

The program supports competitive grants to
local educational agencies. The purpose of these grants is to promote
the teaching of traditional American history in elementary and
secondary schools as a separate academic subject. Grants are used to
improve the quality of history instruction by supporting professional
development for teachers of American history. In order to receive a
grant, a local educational agency must agree to carry out the proposed
activities in partnership with one or more of the following:
institutions of higher education, nonprofit history or humanities
organizations, libraries, or museums.

This past year the federal government awarded $114.7 million for 121 new grant programs.  I’ve been hoping to get involved in one of these programs for quite some time.  Luckily, I will have the opportunity to do so early next year thanks to Andy Mink of the University of Virginia.  At this point I am scheduled for two sessions, the first is in January where I will team-up with Professor Robert Kenzer of the University of Richmond to organize a workshop on memory and the Civil War.  I plan to show teachers how they can utilize Ken Burns’s documentary to encourage discussion of these issues as well as basic media literacy.  In February I will work with Thavolia Glymph of Duke University and a group of teachers in Virginia Beach on how to analyze key turning points between 1850-1877. 

I am looking forward to both workshops as it will be a step in a new direction and one that will hopefully lead to even more opportunities in this area.

Interpretation Run Amock at Colonial Williamsburg

[Hat-Tip to Andrew Duppstadt at Civil War Navy]

144th Anniversary of the Crater

LouisMartin With all of the unknowns surrounding the presence of black men in Confederate armies it is easy to lose sight of the fact that roughly 200,000 black Americans volunteered for the United States Army.  Their wartime record attest to hardships faced both on and off the battlefield.  On this anniversary of the Crater I share one such example.  [photograph from the National Archives and Records Administration]

On July 30, 1864 Private Louis Martin of Co. E, 29th U.S. Colored Infantry took part in the battle of the Crater.  His discharge form reads as follows: “Loss of right-arm and left-leg by amputation for shell and gunshot wounds received in battle at Petersburg on July 30, 1864 in charging the enemies works.  In consequence of which is totally disabled for military service and civil occupation wholly.” (December 2, 1865)

Note: Archivists at NARA are still looking into the origins of the necklace that Martin is wearing.  For more on this regiment’s service, see Edward A. Miller, The Black Civil War Soldiers of Illinois: The Story of the Twenty-ninth U.S. Colored Infantry (University of South Carolina Press, 1998).

Alan Nolan

I just found out that Alan Nolan died yesterday.  As far as I can tell there is nothing in the news so if I come across any additional information I will make sure to pass it on.  Nolan was the author of numerous Civil War studies, most notably, Lee Considered: Robert E. Lee and Civil War History and the Iron Brigade: A Military History.

Please feel free to share your memories of this controversial historian.  I am interested in hearing from those of you who knew him personally or have spent time reading his books and articles.

New Market Battlefield State Historical Park: A Short Review

Picture-078
I had a wonderful time yesterday at the New Market Battlefield.  I started off in the Visitors Center and Hall of Valor museum.  The structure itself is quite unusual, but I have to say that after observing it from various distances it actually compliments the landscape quite nicely.  I spent about an hour walking through the various exhibits and was most impressed with their collection of paintings and objects by Moses Ezekiel.  The stained glass window by Ami Shamir is also quite interesting.  On the other hand I was appalled by their exhibit of the war in Virginia which is clearly outdated.   The panels say very little about the war in Virginia beyond the battles and leave the visitor wondering what it was all about or how the war itself evolved between 1861-65.   I skipped their movie, “Field of Lost Shoes” since I’ve already seen it on my local PBS station. 

You can drive to the various stops on the battlefield, but I decided to walk it.  Luckily the heat and the nats kept all of the visitors in between the Hall of Valor and Bushong Family farm, so I had pretty much the entire battlefield to myself.  I toured through the Bushong home and spent a few minutes staring out the basement window trying to imagine myself back in the battle.  There were no interpreters around, but what I found most troubling was the lack of any references to the family’s slaves.  I assume the Bushong family did not tend their 260+ acre tract alone, but perhaps I am mistaken.   The battlefield itself is quite impressive other than the fact that Interstate 81 runs right through it.  I brought along my copy of William Davis’s book on the battle which allowed me to really get a feel of how the fighting evolved.  It is hard not to be impressed with the conduct of the VMI Cadets and I ended up spending about an hour sitting on the “Field of Lost Shoes” reading through the relevant sections of Davis.  From there you can see the position occupied by Kleiser’s Federal battery directly in front along with the additional artillery along Bushong Hill, which overlooks the North Fork of the Shenandoah River.  I then made my way over to the Confederate right to follow the movements of the 54th Pennsylvania which suffered the highest regimental loss during the battle.  The battlefield includes only two monuments and one is quite crude, though this allows the visitor to keep the focus on the topography itself.

Afterwords I took a quick walk through New Market and grabbed a bite to eat.  I stopped in a cheesy little Civil War store where you can find John Paul Strain paintings on just about every object imaginable.  Do people actually buy that crap?  All in all it was an enjoyable day trip and one that I highly recommend.

I took a few photographs which you can find here.

Talk About Confederate Slaves Pays Off

I know I’ve said it before, but it bears repeating that our recent forum concerning black Confederates/Confederate slaves is perhaps the most intelligent discussion on this topic to be found on the Internet.  My commentary over the past ten days has clearly paid off in terms of its place in the Google rankings.  If you had searched for “black Confederates” six months ago the first post from Civil War Memory would have appeared on page 7.  Try searching for “black Confederates” now (7/28/08) and you will find Peter Carmichael’s essay on the subject at the bottom of the first page.  Search for “black Confederate” and you will get my 9-part series of posts on Weary Clyburn at the bottom of the first page. 

It is going to be difficult to move up in the rankings even further given that these sites have been around for quite some time.  The 37th Texas site is one of my personal favorites. It’s a real whoot.  Some of the others reference the shoddy work that went into Pelican’s Black Confederates, which is nothing more than a collection of accounts without any serious attempt at analysis.  Between my own commentary on the subject and Peter’s essay this blog does not claim to offer the final word on Confederate slaves.  We have tried to show that the subject is much more complex and that the questions that have tended to be posed are inadequate for understanding the master-slave relationship.  Between Peter’s essay and the discussion which ensued it is clear that we also need to take a much more critical stance in regard to the range of sources used as well as how those sources are interpreted.   I see a couple of research projects coming out of our discussion that could begin to fill in some of the major gaps in our understanding. 

It may be a trivial matter to some, but I am delighted that people are now much more likely to find this site when searching this particular subject. 

Barney on the Emancipation Proclamation

Today seems like a good day for a road trip, so in about an hour I will head on out to the beautiful Shenandoah Valley to the New Market Battlefield.  I’ve passed the battlefield a number of times, but have never taken the opportunity to visit.  In the meantime enjoy this Andy Griffith classic.