<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Black Confederate? (Part 1 of 9)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/</link>
	<description>Where History, Heritage, and Education Intersect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Levin</title>
		<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Kelley,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your contribution.  I am certainly aware of the discrimination and treatment that USCTs faced during the war from both within the Union army and by Confederates on battlefields such as the Crater.  In fact, I have complied quite a list of wartime sources from the Crater that point to very harsh treatment on the battlefield as well as an overall tendency on the part of whites to blame them for the defeat.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t speak to your statistical analysis as I do not have the formulas you used or any sense of how you analyzed the evidence.I don&#039;t believe that I have taken the position of &quot;I don&#039;t believe it&quot; in regard to this question.  Simply put, I am interested in how slaves operated in Confederate ranks and how their presence shaped the master-slave relationship.  I am sorry if you have a problem with that, but I assure you that I am not engaged in some kind of morality play where the end goal is to vindicate one side over the other.  My interests in history are different.  If you choose to believe otherwise, so be it.  Essentially, I agree with the NPS statement.  We need serious research along the lines of what Peter Carmichael outlined in his guest post rather than the simple collection of sources as is the case with most Websites and books such as those published by Pelican Press.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Kelley,</p>
<p>Thank you for your contribution.  I am certainly aware of the discrimination and treatment that USCTs faced during the war from both within the Union army and by Confederates on battlefields such as the Crater.  In fact, I have complied quite a list of wartime sources from the Crater that point to very harsh treatment on the battlefield as well as an overall tendency on the part of whites to blame them for the defeat.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t speak to your statistical analysis as I do not have the formulas you used or any sense of how you analyzed the evidence.I don&#8217;t believe that I have taken the position of &#8220;I don&#8217;t believe it&#8221; in regard to this question.  Simply put, I am interested in how slaves operated in Confederate ranks and how their presence shaped the master-slave relationship.  I am sorry if you have a problem with that, but I assure you that I am not engaged in some kind of morality play where the end goal is to vindicate one side over the other.  My interests in history are different.  If you choose to believe otherwise, so be it.  Essentially, I agree with the NPS statement.  We need serious research along the lines of what Peter Carmichael outlined in his guest post rather than the simple collection of sources as is the case with most Websites and books such as those published by Pelican Press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kelley</title>
		<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding Black Confederates, the following is the position of the National Park Service:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;June 20, 2005&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Much more information is available, especially from official, preserved government records, about the role of African American soldiers in the Union army.  The numbers of those soldiers per se were undoubtedly greater than in the Confederate army.  In addition, the federal government officially approved a recruitment policy for African Americans, including slaves (the majority of African Americans) into the Union army by 1863.  The Confederate States did not officially approve the recruitment of African American slaves into the Confederate army until nearly the end of the war.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While some free African Americans served in the Confederate army, their role is not as well documented and preserved.  In addition, many African Americans who served in some capacity in the Confederate army, often anonymously,  were slaves.  It is difficult to have precise information in the present about the ways in which they served, and the exact military role they played.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We hope over time to be able to include more information on all African Americans who served, both slave and free, including those who served in any capacity in the Confederate war effort.  As some writers have pointed out even the official records preserved by the federal government have episodic references to this subject.  It is a matter of collecting material from disparate sources to compile a portrait of the issue. It is a less well known part of Civil War history, because it was not as well documented, but it is a part of the overall history that we would like to include over time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Marilyn W. Nickels, Ph.D.&lt;br /&gt;
Project Manager&lt;br /&gt;
African-American History Web Project&lt;br /&gt;
Office of the Chief Information Officer/NISC&lt;br /&gt;
National Park Service&lt;br /&gt;
1201 Eye Street, NW&lt;br /&gt;
Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
202/354-1449&lt;br /&gt;
202/371-1549 (fax)&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Additionally, Hari Jones, Director of the African-American Civil War Memorial and Museum in Washington, DC, has his own research which further substantiates the service of Black Confederates in combat.  The Harper&#039;s Weekly illustration of Black Confederate pickets published on their front page issue of January 10, 1863, is sold in the gift shop there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This &quot;discussion&quot; consists mainly of accepting any reference or opinion that disputes the existence and service of Black Confederates and dismissing, without viable justification, any contemporaneous evidence which supports their existence and service.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would be interested in seeing how this &quot;discussion&quot; dismisses the NPS position of the Project Manager of the African-American History Web Project and the position of Hari Jones beyond simply saying, &quot;I don&#039;t believe it.&quot;  Facts and figures, folks, not personal prejudices.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Conversations with the descendants of Black Confederates who have first-hand information from the serving Black Confederates, as does Nelson Winbush, or a strong oral history as do the Great-grandsons of Silas Chandler, are a different matter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The bottom line is this:  if one discounts by simply saying, &quot;I don&#039;t believe it&quot; all contemporaneous documentation regarding Black Confederates from all sources, including the Federal Official Records, as well as all family oral histories then dismissing the service of Black Confederates is easy - intellectually disingenuous, but easy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just as an aside regarding real historical investigation - something not often present on this thread - I have performed a statistical breakdown regarding the percentage of United States Colored Troops executed by the Union Army during the War.  The figures show a disturbing trend of lethal racism:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;USCT constituted about 4.7% of the total Union ground forces (187,000 of 4,000,000)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of the 269 Union soldiers recorded as formally executed during the war USCT made up 21.2% (57) of the executions - a rate about 450% greater than their percentage presence in the Union Army.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;USCT were executed at a rate of .03% (three one-hundredths of one percent) of total USCT in service.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There were 212 non-USCT executed.  They were executed at a rate of .005% (five one-thousandths of one percent) of total Union soldiers in service.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;14 USCT were executed for &quot;Mutiny&quot; - 24.6% of total USCT executed and 87.5% of total number of Union executions for &quot;Mutiny&quot; (16)&lt;br /&gt;
2 non-USCT were executed for &quot;Mutiny&quot;  - less than 1% of total non-USCT executions&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;28 USCT were executed for &quot;Murder&quot; - 49% of total USCT executed and 41% of all Union executions for &quot;Murder&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
40 non-USCT soldiers were executed for &quot;Murder&quot;  - 18.9% of total non-USCT executions&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;13 USCT were executed for &quot;Rape&quot; - 22.8% of total USCT executed and 62% of all Union executions for &quot;Rape&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
8 non-USCT soldiers were executed for &quot;Rape&quot;  - 3.8% of total non-USCT executions&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2 USCT were executed for &quot;Desertion&quot; - 3.6% of total USCT executed and .7% of total Union executions&lt;br /&gt;
146 non-USCT soldiers were executed for &quot;Desertion&quot;  - 68.9% of total non-USCT executions&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;USCT were six times more likely to be charged, convicted and executed for capital offenses than non-USCT Union soldiers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Black Confederates, the following is the position of the National Park Service:</p>
<p>&#8220;June 20, 2005</p>
<p>Much more information is available, especially from official, preserved government records, about the role of African American soldiers in the Union army.  The numbers of those soldiers per se were undoubtedly greater than in the Confederate army.  In addition, the federal government officially approved a recruitment policy for African Americans, including slaves (the majority of African Americans) into the Union army by 1863.  The Confederate States did not officially approve the recruitment of African American slaves into the Confederate army until nearly the end of the war.</p>
<p>While some free African Americans served in the Confederate army, their role is not as well documented and preserved.  In addition, many African Americans who served in some capacity in the Confederate army, often anonymously,  were slaves.  It is difficult to have precise information in the present about the ways in which they served, and the exact military role they played.</p>
<p>We hope over time to be able to include more information on all African Americans who served, both slave and free, including those who served in any capacity in the Confederate war effort.  As some writers have pointed out even the official records preserved by the federal government have episodic references to this subject.  It is a matter of collecting material from disparate sources to compile a portrait of the issue. It is a less well known part of Civil War history, because it was not as well documented, but it is a part of the overall history that we would like to include over time.</p>
<p>Marilyn W. Nickels, Ph.D.<br />
Project Manager<br />
African-American History Web Project<br />
Office of the Chief Information Officer/NISC<br />
National Park Service<br />
1201 Eye Street, NW<br />
Washington, D.C.<br />
202/354-1449<br />
202/371-1549 (fax)&#8221;</p>
<p>Additionally, Hari Jones, Director of the African-American Civil War Memorial and Museum in Washington, DC, has his own research which further substantiates the service of Black Confederates in combat.  The Harper&#8217;s Weekly illustration of Black Confederate pickets published on their front page issue of January 10, 1863, is sold in the gift shop there.</p>
<p>This &#8220;discussion&#8221; consists mainly of accepting any reference or opinion that disputes the existence and service of Black Confederates and dismissing, without viable justification, any contemporaneous evidence which supports their existence and service.</p>
<p>I would be interested in seeing how this &#8220;discussion&#8221; dismisses the NPS position of the Project Manager of the African-American History Web Project and the position of Hari Jones beyond simply saying, &#8220;I don&#8217;t believe it.&#8221;  Facts and figures, folks, not personal prejudices.</p>
<p>Conversations with the descendants of Black Confederates who have first-hand information from the serving Black Confederates, as does Nelson Winbush, or a strong oral history as do the Great-grandsons of Silas Chandler, are a different matter.</p>
<p>The bottom line is this:  if one discounts by simply saying, &#8220;I don&#8217;t believe it&#8221; all contemporaneous documentation regarding Black Confederates from all sources, including the Federal Official Records, as well as all family oral histories then dismissing the service of Black Confederates is easy &#8211; intellectually disingenuous, but easy.</p>
<p>Just as an aside regarding real historical investigation &#8211; something not often present on this thread &#8211; I have performed a statistical breakdown regarding the percentage of United States Colored Troops executed by the Union Army during the War.  The figures show a disturbing trend of lethal racism:</p>
<p>USCT constituted about 4.7% of the total Union ground forces (187,000 of 4,000,000)</p>
<p>Of the 269 Union soldiers recorded as formally executed during the war USCT made up 21.2% (57) of the executions &#8211; a rate about 450% greater than their percentage presence in the Union Army.</p>
<p>USCT were executed at a rate of .03% (three one-hundredths of one percent) of total USCT in service.</p>
<p>There were 212 non-USCT executed.  They were executed at a rate of .005% (five one-thousandths of one percent) of total Union soldiers in service.</p>
<p>14 USCT were executed for &#8220;Mutiny&#8221; &#8211; 24.6% of total USCT executed and 87.5% of total number of Union executions for &#8220;Mutiny&#8221; (16)<br />
2 non-USCT were executed for &#8220;Mutiny&#8221;  &#8211; less than 1% of total non-USCT executions</p>
<p>28 USCT were executed for &#8220;Murder&#8221; &#8211; 49% of total USCT executed and 41% of all Union executions for &#8220;Murder&#8221;<br />
40 non-USCT soldiers were executed for &#8220;Murder&#8221;  &#8211; 18.9% of total non-USCT executions</p>
<p>13 USCT were executed for &#8220;Rape&#8221; &#8211; 22.8% of total USCT executed and 62% of all Union executions for &#8220;Rape&#8221;<br />
8 non-USCT soldiers were executed for &#8220;Rape&#8221;  &#8211; 3.8% of total non-USCT executions</p>
<p>2 USCT were executed for &#8220;Desertion&#8221; &#8211; 3.6% of total USCT executed and .7% of total Union executions<br />
146 non-USCT soldiers were executed for &#8220;Desertion&#8221;  &#8211; 68.9% of total non-USCT executions</p>
<p>USCT were six times more likely to be charged, convicted and executed for capital offenses than non-USCT Union soldiers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Levin</title>
		<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The problem is that Civil War historians have had very little to say on this important issue.  The upshot is that the subject has been monopolized by a select few who clearly have a narrow agenda to further rather than approach the question from a more scholarly/analytical angle.  The examples you cite are typical.  I highly recommend that you read Bruce Levine&#039;s _Confederate Emancipation_ (Oxford University Press), which does a very good job of laying out the debate behind the recruitment of slaves in the Confederate service as well as the postwar evolution of the story of black Confederates.  I also recommend, if you haven&#039;t done so already, that you read Peter Carmichael&#039;s essay which is this blog&#039;s featured post at the moment.  Peter lays out a fairly sophisticated framework for approaching this topic.  Thanks again for taking the time to write and I look forward to future comments. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that Civil War historians have had very little to say on this important issue.  The upshot is that the subject has been monopolized by a select few who clearly have a narrow agenda to further rather than approach the question from a more scholarly/analytical angle.  The examples you cite are typical.  I highly recommend that you read Bruce Levine&#8217;s _Confederate Emancipation_ (Oxford University Press), which does a very good job of laying out the debate behind the recruitment of slaves in the Confederate service as well as the postwar evolution of the story of black Confederates.  I also recommend, if you haven&#8217;t done so already, that you read Peter Carmichael&#8217;s essay which is this blog&#8217;s featured post at the moment.  Peter lays out a fairly sophisticated framework for approaching this topic.  Thanks again for taking the time to write and I look forward to future comments. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thud</title>
		<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Thud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I posted a few Civil War entries on my weblog and was almost immediately joined by new readers pushing the &quot;Black Confederate&quot; line -- something I never heard about and could find very little to contradict what they were saying. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The warning signs for me were 1) it all sounded anecdotal rather than historical. and 2) the neo-confederate strategy of contradictory example (&quot;black confederate&quot;) and deflection (&quot;Lincoln was a racist&quot;) were similar to Intelligent Design argument, of which I am much more familiar.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a shame I couldn&#039;t find your blog a month ago, but LGM posted the link, I&#039;m subscribed via RSS now and working my way through the archives. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted a few Civil War entries on my weblog and was almost immediately joined by new readers pushing the &#8220;Black Confederate&#8221; line &#8212; something I never heard about and could find very little to contradict what they were saying. </p>
<p>The warning signs for me were 1) it all sounded anecdotal rather than historical. and 2) the neo-confederate strategy of contradictory example (&#8220;black confederate&#8221;) and deflection (&#8220;Lincoln was a racist&#8221;) were similar to Intelligent Design argument, of which I am much more familiar.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame I couldn&#8217;t find your blog a month ago, but LGM posted the link, I&#8217;m subscribed via RSS now and working my way through the archives. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jamey Creel&#039;s posts are typical of the stew of falsehoods and misrepresentations that constitute the argument for &quot;black Confederates.&quot; If there had been 3,000 black Confederate soldiers at Antietam, then they were most certainly the best soldiers in the army, since none were captured or killed. Grant owned one slave in his life, for about a year, and manumitted him in 1859. The Grant quote is an outright falsehood. There is the typical conflation of forced slave labor with enlisted soldiers; the typical accusations concerning Lincoln&#039;s racism, contrasted with the warmth and affection between the races in the South. The Douglass claim is one I&#039;ve seen a number of times, and this demonstrates the inability, or unwillingness, of neo-Confederate advocates of &quot;black Confederates&quot; to engage critically with historical evidence. While I&#039;ve not verified the quote itself, Douglass is supposed to have claimed in a speech in the fall of 1861 that there were blacks, in some cases actively fighting, in Confederate ranks. What is not mentioned is that Douglass could have no firsthand knowledge of such things, there was a fear in the North that black slaves would be used against federal armies, and that Douglass was actively campaigning for the enlistment of blacks as soldiers. The point is that historical documents, statements, and oral tradition, such as the stories Weary Clyburn&#039;s daughter claims he told her, cannot just be assembled and offered as proof of anything, but must be interpreted within the larger historical context and relevant historical record.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamey Creel&#8217;s posts are typical of the stew of falsehoods and misrepresentations that constitute the argument for &#8220;black Confederates.&#8221; If there had been 3,000 black Confederate soldiers at Antietam, then they were most certainly the best soldiers in the army, since none were captured or killed. Grant owned one slave in his life, for about a year, and manumitted him in 1859. The Grant quote is an outright falsehood. There is the typical conflation of forced slave labor with enlisted soldiers; the typical accusations concerning Lincoln&#8217;s racism, contrasted with the warmth and affection between the races in the South. The Douglass claim is one I&#8217;ve seen a number of times, and this demonstrates the inability, or unwillingness, of neo-Confederate advocates of &#8220;black Confederates&#8221; to engage critically with historical evidence. While I&#8217;ve not verified the quote itself, Douglass is supposed to have claimed in a speech in the fall of 1861 that there were blacks, in some cases actively fighting, in Confederate ranks. What is not mentioned is that Douglass could have no firsthand knowledge of such things, there was a fear in the North that black slaves would be used against federal armies, and that Douglass was actively campaigning for the enlistment of blacks as soldiers. The point is that historical documents, statements, and oral tradition, such as the stories Weary Clyburn&#8217;s daughter claims he told her, cannot just be assembled and offered as proof of anything, but must be interpreted within the larger historical context and relevant historical record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Levin</title>
		<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1033</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Walter Williams has never done research on this issue.  Simply collecting sources from various places does not constitute serious thinking concerning a complex topic.  I&#039;ve seen many of the accounts you speak of, but they do not demonstrate that thousands of slaves fought with Confederate armies in the way that you believe.  More importantly, simply declaring them to be loyal tells us nothing about the relationship between the slave and master.  The Confederate government did not formally recruit slaves until close to the end of the war and only after a vigorous debate.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have said nothing about Lincoln on this matter because he is not relevant.  Lincoln chose to allow blacks to serve for a number of reasons and those reasons have been analyzed by numerous historians.  I do not deny that thousands of blacks traveled with Confederate armies and on occasion may have picked up a gun, but they were not serving in any official capacity.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Again, simply collecting stories in one place is not serious research.  The way you frame the issue is much too simplistic for me.  Again, read Joe Glatthaar&#039;s new book or Bruce Levine&#039;s _Confederate Emancipation_ (Oxford University Press).  Thanks again for writing.  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter Williams has never done research on this issue.  Simply collecting sources from various places does not constitute serious thinking concerning a complex topic.  I&#8217;ve seen many of the accounts you speak of, but they do not demonstrate that thousands of slaves fought with Confederate armies in the way that you believe.  More importantly, simply declaring them to be loyal tells us nothing about the relationship between the slave and master.  The Confederate government did not formally recruit slaves until close to the end of the war and only after a vigorous debate.  </p>
<p>I have said nothing about Lincoln on this matter because he is not relevant.  Lincoln chose to allow blacks to serve for a number of reasons and those reasons have been analyzed by numerous historians.  I do not deny that thousands of blacks traveled with Confederate armies and on occasion may have picked up a gun, but they were not serving in any official capacity.  </p>
<p>Again, simply collecting stories in one place is not serious research.  The way you frame the issue is much too simplistic for me.  Again, read Joe Glatthaar&#8217;s new book or Bruce Levine&#8217;s _Confederate Emancipation_ (Oxford University Press).  Thanks again for writing.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamey B Creel</title>
		<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamey B Creel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1032</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So just because Walter Williams you claim is not a &quot;historian&quot; his views are invalid? The General Forrest statement was made BY Forrest in a Congressional hearing. There are records in the &quot;Official Records of the War of Rebellion&quot; printed by US government that state blacks, free and slave, took up arms for the Confederacy. William Ellison, a free South Carolina black slave owner and one of the States richest men, sons supported Confederacy. His grandson fought in an artillery group.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dallas Moses, a river boat pilot, DIED trying to capture the USS Waterwitch.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There are official reports of “Negro” Confederate sharpshooters (snipers), “well mounted” scouts, etc, etc, etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nelson Winbush, a SCV compatriot of mine in Florida, it was his grandfather who was one of those slaves (later freed and still fought) who fought with Gen Forrest that he testified about in Congress!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Records show Confederate blacks being captured at Gettysburg and refusing to sign oath of loyalty to US government and spending up to 22 months in prison. I just visited Gettysburg’s new museum and there is no mention of this men who refused to betray their families. Why? Is it because people like you keep promoting this falsehood that black Confederate who fought are a “myth?”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There was NO black US troops at Gettysburg. Why? This was the first year Lincoln’s government even allowed blacks in army and the same year New York protested this fact. There were no such riots in the South.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yet people like you claim this is &quot;invalid?&quot; It is in the OFFICIAL RECORDS that Williams quoted from. How is this invalid?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In Wakulla County Florida when the US landed troops and shelled a TOWN the only civilians killed were 5 black slaves.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then you say &quot;Lincoln&#039;s views on race and slavery are not open to discussion right now as they have nothing to do with the issue at hand.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You are trying to imply blacks did not &quot;fight&quot; for CS, and say Lincoln is not the issue? He started a war, people like you claim was over slavery. Frederick Douglas, a man who was there STATED there were thousands of blacks &quot;with rifles on their shoulders and bullets in there pockets&quot; marching in step with their Confederate comrades, at a time when racist Lincoln didn&#039;t allow even free blacks to be in his army! And this has nothing to do with issue?! Y&#039;all keep promoting this was a war about &quot;just slavery&quot; yet want to deny Lincoln views?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So just because Walter Williams you claim is not a &#8220;historian&#8221; his views are invalid? The General Forrest statement was made BY Forrest in a Congressional hearing. There are records in the &#8220;Official Records of the War of Rebellion&#8221; printed by US government that state blacks, free and slave, took up arms for the Confederacy. William Ellison, a free South Carolina black slave owner and one of the States richest men, sons supported Confederacy. His grandson fought in an artillery group.</p>
<p>Dallas Moses, a river boat pilot, DIED trying to capture the USS Waterwitch.</p>
<p>There are official reports of “Negro” Confederate sharpshooters (snipers), “well mounted” scouts, etc, etc, etc.</p>
<p>Nelson Winbush, a SCV compatriot of mine in Florida, it was his grandfather who was one of those slaves (later freed and still fought) who fought with Gen Forrest that he testified about in Congress!</p>
<p>Records show Confederate blacks being captured at Gettysburg and refusing to sign oath of loyalty to US government and spending up to 22 months in prison. I just visited Gettysburg’s new museum and there is no mention of this men who refused to betray their families. Why? Is it because people like you keep promoting this falsehood that black Confederate who fought are a “myth?”</p>
<p>There was NO black US troops at Gettysburg. Why? This was the first year Lincoln’s government even allowed blacks in army and the same year New York protested this fact. There were no such riots in the South.</p>
<p>Yet people like you claim this is &#8220;invalid?&#8221; It is in the OFFICIAL RECORDS that Williams quoted from. How is this invalid?</p>
<p>In Wakulla County Florida when the US landed troops and shelled a TOWN the only civilians killed were 5 black slaves.</p>
<p>Then you say &#8220;Lincoln&#8217;s views on race and slavery are not open to discussion right now as they have nothing to do with the issue at hand.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are trying to imply blacks did not &#8220;fight&#8221; for CS, and say Lincoln is not the issue? He started a war, people like you claim was over slavery. Frederick Douglas, a man who was there STATED there were thousands of blacks &#8220;with rifles on their shoulders and bullets in there pockets&#8221; marching in step with their Confederate comrades, at a time when racist Lincoln didn&#8217;t allow even free blacks to be in his army! And this has nothing to do with issue?! Y&#8217;all keep promoting this was a war about &#8220;just slavery&#8221; yet want to deny Lincoln views?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Levin</title>
		<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jamey, -- Thanks for taking the time to write.  First, Walter Williams is not a historian and he has never conducted serious research on this subject.  His views are irrelevant.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for Ed Smith&#039;s claim I challenge you to find a modern scholarly study that confirms his findings.  You are not going to find it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lincoln&#039;s views on race and slavery are not open to discussion right now as they have nothing to do with the issue at hand.  I do understand, however, that it is important to the people who push this line of thought since their goal is some kind of moral parity between North and South.  Let me be clear that I am not denying the idea of thousands of black Confederates because I have some hidden agenda that seeks to prop up Lincoln and the rest of the North on a moral platform.  I am interested in what can be concluded based on available evidence.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you are interested in some of the complexity behind this topic I recommend starting with the chapter on blacks and the Confederacy in Joseph Glatthaar&#039;s new book, _General Lee&#039;s Army_ (Free Press, 2008). &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamey, &#8212; Thanks for taking the time to write.  First, Walter Williams is not a historian and he has never conducted serious research on this subject.  His views are irrelevant.  </p>
<p>As for Ed Smith&#8217;s claim I challenge you to find a modern scholarly study that confirms his findings.  You are not going to find it.</p>
<p>Lincoln&#8217;s views on race and slavery are not open to discussion right now as they have nothing to do with the issue at hand.  I do understand, however, that it is important to the people who push this line of thought since their goal is some kind of moral parity between North and South.  Let me be clear that I am not denying the idea of thousands of black Confederates because I have some hidden agenda that seeks to prop up Lincoln and the rest of the North on a moral platform.  I am interested in what can be concluded based on available evidence.</p>
<p>If you are interested in some of the complexity behind this topic I recommend starting with the chapter on blacks and the Confederacy in Joseph Glatthaar&#8217;s new book, _General Lee&#8217;s Army_ (Free Press, 2008). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamey B Creel</title>
		<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamey B Creel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1030</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;      &quot;Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest had slaves and freemen serving in units under his command. After the war, Forrest said of the black men who served under him, &quot;These boys stayed with me.. - and better Confederates did not live.&quot; Articles in &quot;Black Southerners in Gray,&quot; edited by Richard Rollins, gives numerous accounts of blacks serving as fighting men or servants in every battle from Gettysburg to Vicksburg. &lt;br /&gt;
Professor Ed Smith, director of American Studies at American University, says Stonewall Jackson had 3,000 fully equipped black troops scattered throughout his corps at Antietam - the war&#039;s bloodiest battle. Mr. Smith calculates that between 60,000 and 93,000 blacks served the Confederacy in some capacity. They fought for the same reason they fought in previous wars and wars afterward: &quot;to position themselves. They had to prove they were patriots in the hope the future would be better ... they hoped to be rewarded.&quot; &lt;br /&gt;
Many knew Lincoln had little love for enslaved blacks and didn&#039;t wage war against the South for their benefit. Lincoln made that plain, saying, &quot;I will say, then, that I am not, nor have ever been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races ... I am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.&quot; The very words of his 1863 Emancipation Proclamation revealed his deceit and cunning; it freed those slaves held &quot;within any State or designated part of a State the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States.&quot; It didn&#039;t apply to slaves in West Virginia and areas and states not in rebellion. Like Gen. Ulysses Grant&#039;s slaves, they had to wait for the 13th Amendment, Grant explained why he didn&#039;t free his slaves earlier, saying, &quot;Good help is so hard to come by these days.&quot; &quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Source:  This article appeared in the Washington Times some years back. It was written by Walter Williams,  an economics professor at George Mason University, a nationally syndicated columnist, an African-American, and one of the most effective speakers I have ever heard!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>      &#8220;Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest had slaves and freemen serving in units under his command. After the war, Forrest said of the black men who served under him, &#8220;These boys stayed with me.. &#8211; and better Confederates did not live.&#8221; Articles in &#8220;Black Southerners in Gray,&#8221; edited by Richard Rollins, gives numerous accounts of blacks serving as fighting men or servants in every battle from Gettysburg to Vicksburg. <br />
Professor Ed Smith, director of American Studies at American University, says Stonewall Jackson had 3,000 fully equipped black troops scattered throughout his corps at Antietam &#8211; the war&#8217;s bloodiest battle. Mr. Smith calculates that between 60,000 and 93,000 blacks served the Confederacy in some capacity. They fought for the same reason they fought in previous wars and wars afterward: &#8220;to position themselves. They had to prove they were patriots in the hope the future would be better &#8230; they hoped to be rewarded.&#8221; <br />
Many knew Lincoln had little love for enslaved blacks and didn&#8217;t wage war against the South for their benefit. Lincoln made that plain, saying, &#8220;I will say, then, that I am not, nor have ever been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races &#8230; I am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.&#8221; The very words of his 1863 Emancipation Proclamation revealed his deceit and cunning; it freed those slaves held &#8220;within any State or designated part of a State the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States.&#8221; It didn&#8217;t apply to slaves in West Virginia and areas and states not in rebellion. Like Gen. Ulysses Grant&#8217;s slaves, they had to wait for the 13th Amendment, Grant explained why he didn&#8217;t free his slaves earlier, saying, &#8220;Good help is so hard to come by these days.&#8221; &#8220;</p>
<p>Source:  This article appeared in the Washington Times some years back. It was written by Walter Williams,  an economics professor at George Mason University, a nationally syndicated columnist, an African-American, and one of the most effective speakers I have ever heard!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twisted_Colour</title>
		<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1029</link>
		<dc:creator>Twisted_Colour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1029</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;most of this comes directly from the mouth of Weary Clyburn&#039;s LIVING daughter&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Whoa!!! Just how old is Weary&#039;s LIVING daughter? And if she&#039;s under 100, how old was Weary when he fathered her?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;most of this comes directly from the mouth of Weary Clyburn&#8217;s LIVING daughter&#8221;</p>
<p>Whoa!!! Just how old is Weary&#8217;s LIVING daughter? And if she&#8217;s under 100, how old was Weary when he fathered her?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Levin</title>
		<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the tip Richard.  I removed the links.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip Richard.  I removed the links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1027</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwmemory.com/2008/07/15/another-black-confederate-part-1-of-9/#comment-1027</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;James M. Miller Camp, 2116 &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wanted to let you know your link to James M Miller Camp throws up a virus on that page.  Using AVG for a virus scanner.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James M. Miller Camp, 2116 </p>
<p>Wanted to let you know your link to James M Miller Camp throws up a virus on that page.  Using AVG for a virus scanner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

