<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tall Flag Poles as Compensation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cwmemory.com/2008/10/20/tall-flag-poles-as-compensation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/10/20/tall-flag-poles-as-compensation/</link>
	<description>Where History, Heritage, and Education Intersect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:35:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Cebula</title>
		<link>http://cwmemory.com/2008/10/20/tall-flag-poles-as-compensation/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Cebula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwmemory.com/2008/10/20/tall-flag-poles-as-compensation/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I do not understand. Are you implying that their scholar vitae are a bit on the short side? Or that their historical understanding is soft, even flaccid? Or are you saying that their analysis does not measure up? Or are you implying that though their spirits are willing, their flesh is weak, historically speaking?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is way too subtle for me.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not understand. Are you implying that their scholar vitae are a bit on the short side? Or that their historical understanding is soft, even flaccid? Or are you saying that their analysis does not measure up? Or are you implying that though their spirits are willing, their flesh is weak, historically speaking?</p>
<p>This is way too subtle for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

