So You Want To Learn About the Civil War?

The Battle Between the Monitor and the Merrimack Xanthus Smith, c. 1880 (VHS)

Well, then head on over to the Virginia Historical Society for their new exhibit, An American Turning Point: The Civil War in Virginia.  I had a chance to sneak in for a few minutes today and it is well worth a visit.  It covers all of the important aspects of the war in Virginia and it does so with a wonderful selection of paintings, artifacts and interactive exhibits.  I am definitely going to have to go back and spend a bit more time. Most importantly, the museum offers a narrative of the war that reflects the best scholarship of the past few decades.   I will give you a sense of what I mean based on their printed guide:

Why Did the Civil War Happen? [Yes, slavery was crucial as a cause of secession & war.]

Slavery caused the war, but the war was not begun to free slaves.  The war had begun to determine whether the Confederate States of America would be allowed to break away as an independent nation, or whether the existing Union would survive.  Only later did the the conflict become one of liberation.  Why did the South want independence?  Southern wealth was mostly invested in slaves or slave-worked land.  Abraham Lincoln, newly elected president, led a party pledged to ban slavery in new states.

War or Murder? [Both Grant and Lee engaged in bloody assaults throughout the war.]

Throughout the war, both sides sought a single decisive victory long after it was clear that no such event was achievable…. Although Grant was called a butcher, Confederate losses, relative to the size of their army, were greater.

Men of Color To Arms? [Sorry, but no black Confederates prior to March 13, 1865.]

A few southern soldiers and civilians suggested as early as January 1864 that the Confederacy enlist slaves as soldiers, but most white southerners disagreed.  One Confederate politician noted that, “if slaves will make good soldiers [then] our whole theory is wrong.”  Desperate to avert defeat, the Confederacy authorized the enlistment of slaves on March 13, 1865, far too late to affect the outcome of the war.

Who Was the Traitor and Who the Patriot? [Virginians ought to remember their Confederates and Unionists.]

In 1861, pro-Union supporters defended the nation that had been created in 1776.  Pro-Confederates said they were exercising the right, enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, to “alter or abolish” unrepresentative and oppressive government.  Wherever a Virginian placed his or her loyalty–to the rebel nation of 1776 of the new rebel nation of 1861–he or she was a patriot to the eyes of some and a traitor to others.

How Did Slaves Support the Confederacy? [The Confederacy (including Virginia) went to war as a slaveholding society.]

Slaves and free blacks provided more labor than usual for Virginia farms when 89 percent of eligible white men served in Confederate armies.  Enslaved men were sometimes forced into service to build fortifications, women to serve as laundresses and cooks for troops in the field.  Fearful that they might lose their freedom if they failed to contribute to the war effort, free blacks often worked beside the slaves, for minimal wages.

Did the Civil War End At Appomattox? [We need to think about the war beyond Appomattox.]

Freedom as Confederate independence failed.  Defeat threatened to change white southern identity that had been based on racial supremacy.  Although black Virginians  were no longer enslaved, equality remained an unfulfilled goal for generations to come.

CraterThanks for reading this post. Scroll down, leave a comment and join the conversation if you are so inclined. Follow me on Twitter and join the Civil War Memory Facebook group for continuous updates and additional links to newsworthy items from around the interwebs. Stay up to date by subscribing to this blog’s feed. You can also check out my recently published book, Remembering the Battle of the Crater: War as Murder.

6 comments… add one

  • Paul Thornton Feb 8, 2011

    Hello Kevin,

    I was looking into contacting the VHS for a little interview for my thesis and stumbled accross the contact information for “de Witt, Ann C.”, Manager of Web and Digital Resources. Is this the same Ann de Witt who has worked on the black confedrate soldier? If so, what do you think of her involvement and her role in particular? I notice in your recent webcast on Black Confederate soldiers you cover Ann’s website.

    My apologies if it is not in fact the same person.

    Best,

    Paul.

    • Kevin Levin Feb 8, 2011

      Definitely not the same person. :)

      • Paul Thornton Feb 8, 2011

        Oh I see.. Shame – it would have been an interesting angle.

        Many thanks.

        Paul.

  • Jeanne Feb 8, 2011

    Kevin – thanks so much for promoting this exciting exhibit. Please let your readers know that if anyone is unable to get to Richmond for the exhibit or wants to see it more than once, it will travel around the state to various locations throughout the Sesquicentennial. More information about the schedule can be found here http://www.vacivilwar.org/exhibition.php

    • Kevin Levin Feb 8, 2011

      That’s right. There is also going to be a traveling exhibit on a flatbed truck, which sounds quite promising as well.

  • London John Feb 11, 2011

    The illustration here is a bit outside the usual topics discussed here, but I think it illustrates a minor curiosity of Civil War memory; many writers seem to fail to notice the significance of the fact that the Monitor was unable to sink the Virginia. Also, the Monitor class was specifically designed for coastal and river work, and wasn’t very seaworthy. A monitor in the open sea would have been easy meat for a conventional ironclad with an underwater ram and a fair turn of speed. Even Macpherson, I believe, wrote something like “the Monitor immediately made every other warship in the world obsolete”. Why are historians so impressed by the novelty of the thing that they don’t look at its effectiveness?

Leave a Comment