Post image for Really Bad Civil War Art

Really Bad Civil War Art

by Kevin Levin on March 6, 2011 · 19 comments · Follow me on

in Civil War Culture, Lost Cause

This latest edition of Really Bad Civil War Art comes to us from artist, Roberta Wesley.  This print is titled, “Rebel Yell” and is inspired by her own ancestor, who fought in the “22nd Infantry.”  Apparently, these men took into battle the Confederate flag currently flying over the junction of Interstates 4 and 72 outside of Tampa, Florida.


Get a Signed Copy of My Book ($25 Direct From Author)

"In this stunning and well-researched book, Kevin Levin catches the new waves of the study of memory, black soldiers, and the darker underside of the Civil War as well as anyone has... Levin is both superb scholar and public historian, showing us a piece of the real war that does now get into the books, as well as into site interpretation."

David Blight, Author of Race and Reunion

{ 19 comments… read them below or add one }

Corey Meyer March 6, 2011 at 4:06 pm 1

The author explained her inspiration for the picture as thus…

“Littleton Berry Hooten was one of the nameless soldiers who fought and somehow survived all the numerous bloody battles of the 22nd Infantry.”

Is it possible to be a nameless soldier after you have been named?

Just curious.

Reply

Brooks D. Simpson March 6, 2011 at 8:20 pm 2

The Soldiers and Sailors database offers a different first name for Private Hooten.

Reply

Woodrowfan March 6, 2011 at 4:11 pm 3

judging from the directions they are firing, they seem to be almost surrounded by Yankees…

Reply

Jeffry Burden March 6, 2011 at 5:44 pm 4

I can’t help but conclude that the high-steppin’ fellow in front thinks he’s at a hoedown.

Reply

Andy Hall March 6, 2011 at 4:20 pm 5

I thought “moonlight and magnolias” was just a figure of speech. I was wrong.

Reply

Kevin Levin March 6, 2011 at 4:22 pm 6

Glad to see you found something for your living room. :)

Reply

Stephen Graham March 6, 2011 at 9:10 pm 7

Is there where we point out that there’s no Littleton Hooten in the Civil War Soldiers and Sailors? And no Hootens in the 22d Alabama?

Reply

Kevin Levin March 7, 2011 at 1:55 am 8

Why am I not surprised.

Reply

James F. Epperson March 7, 2011 at 3:53 am 9

There is no I-72 in Tampa. I-75, perhaps? (We wouldn’t want folks confused on where to find that flag, would we?)

Reply

Charles March 7, 2011 at 5:33 am 10

I thought I had seen that flag before?

Reply

Charles March 7, 2011 at 5:35 am 11

There is also one further up I75 going toward Georgia . I have also seen one on I75 in south Georgia. I can’t remember what exits they are near. I just remember seeing them.

Reply

Jeffry Burden March 7, 2011 at 10:47 am 12

Emily, I think historical art is difficult to pull off well. There’s a fine line between moving and goofy, between conveying true emotion artistically and conveying a dumbed-down literalism. It’s even more difficult when doing a generic scene like this that’s not based on a particular event or specific people. If just seeing a battle flag puts a lump in your throat, than this may be fine. But objectively speaking, “Rebel Yell” is nothing more than an in-your-face dose of rootin’, tootin’ rebeldom that is all sex and no cigarette.

My wife wouldn’t take kindly to historical stuff hanging in the house, but if she did, an example of interesting such art that might pass muster is “Death of an Army” by Don Troiani. The key is what it’s conveying artistically: that moment before the deadly charge at Franklin, with Gen. Cleburne pointing his sword in the direction of the enemy, knowing the impending advance likely meant his death and that of his command. It’s the suggestion of action, while itself being almost static — the last quiet moment — that makes it interesting and moving. Troiani’s not even my favored historical artist; I think Keith Rocco produces the most consistently compelling such work.

Long story short: there’s a lot better stuff out there than this dreck. PS: always avoid puffy shirts.

Reply

Emily Hill March 7, 2011 at 9:32 am 13

Okay, too much a novice to know ‘bad art’ from ‘good art’, so I’ll reserve my opinion on the whether’s of this ‘art’ … maybe I wouldn’t hang it in my living room … but to my question:

Today, is there a mandate of political correctness to view the Confederate flag solely as diversionary? i.e. Do people look at it as SOLELY a ‘call to racism’ or does anyone look at it ‘in its moment’ as a symbol of a past era and a lost cause? i.e. Shall we ALL spit on it? Is the art of Wesley’s ancestor ‘bad art’ because it depicts the Confederate flag? Or, technically, is it ‘bad’ art?

Reply

Kevin Levin March 7, 2011 at 9:40 am 14

I highly recommend reading John Coski’s wonderful study of the history of the Confederate flag: As for this particular piece I just think it’s really bad art. Thanks for the comment, Emily.

Reply

Emily Hill March 7, 2011 at 12:48 pm 15

Dear Jeffry and Kevin,
What sweet, generous people…love teach-able moments that are not aspersions that ‘project’ to the other person’s intentions…

Okay! I’ve learned — a lot! Thank you very much ;D

Emily

Reply

Jeffry Burden March 7, 2011 at 1:29 pm 16

Emily,

I must apologize – I gave you my art review without addressing the specific questions you asked.

It’s not bad art because it depicts the battle flag. Lots of “good” art could have the CBF in it. The mere presence of the CBF, for me , does not make it suspect. This is bad art because it’s bad art – unimaginative, simplistically organized, overwhelming in pseudo-emotional force while lacking in emotional depth, pandering to a political stance and not to human feeling. I mean, c’mon – that guy in front looks like he’s from the Ministry of Silly Walks.

That said, I had never heard of Roberta Wesley before today, and make no judgment on her overall talent, her political leanings, her style sense, etc. She may well be a lovely woman and our next great painter. This work, however, is not proof of her merit as an artist, and it has nothing necessarily to do with the fact the CBF is in the painting.

Reply

Kevin Levin March 7, 2011 at 2:01 pm 17

I should also admit that I have a large collection of prints by artist, Don Troiani. In my humble opinion his work is a cut above the rest. A number of his prints include Confederate battle flags.

Reply

Mark March 8, 2011 at 11:09 am 18

Hey, at least the gray-haired guy wielding the sword looks like a stereotypical Confederate re-enactor. On second thought, he might be too thin.

Reply

Robert Welch March 15, 2011 at 12:45 pm 19

I found this today, and was wondering if we could add this to the list of bad Civil War art.

http://www.bradfordexchange.com/products/49072_.html?cm_ven=FB-BEX&cm_cat=CivilWarEraVIL-M35_49072&cm_pla=CivilWarVillage_Img-kp&cm_ite=M35_KW-CivilWar_1Step-N_Niche

If you hurry, you can get a free General Jackson figurine with your next installment!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: