Black Confederate Movement “Demented”

This weekend the University of Virginia’s Miller Center will begin airing their “Our American Forum” interview with Gary Gallagher on public TV stations across the country. The Center has uploaded a few preview clips, but I thought this clip in which Gary describes the black Confederate movement as “demented” was worth sharing. I’ve always appreciated Gary’s ability to cut to the chase in his own colorful way. I certainly agree with his assessment.

CraterThanks for reading this post. Scroll down, leave a comment and join the conversation if you are so inclined. Follow me on Twitter and join the Civil War Memory Facebook group for continuous updates and additional links to newsworthy items from around the interwebs. Stay up to date by subscribing to this blog’s feed. You can also check out my recently published book, Remembering the Battle of the Crater: War as Murder.

15 comments… add one

  • Douglas Egerton Mar 13, 2014

    I’m glad that Professor Gallagher was blunt in his denunciation of this absurd myth. When it comes to such ahistorical nonsense, there really is no reason to be coy.

  • Myra SMpson Mar 13, 2014

    Thank you Gary. May I quote you?

  • Andy Hall Mar 13, 2014

    Succinct.

  • Jeff Howell Mar 14, 2014

    He hits the nail on the head. It’s an attempt to mitigate the institution of slavery and continue the “happy Negro” myth.

  • Woodrowfan Mar 14, 2014

    I love it! thank you for sharing it…

  • BorderRuffian Mar 14, 2014

    Wow…it’s a ‘movement’ now.

    How many BCS do you have to claim to be in the ‘movement?’

    1,000?…..2,000?…..5,000?…..10,000?

    • Kevin Levin Mar 14, 2014

      I don’t worry so much about the numbers. You just have to have a record of saying some absurd things about the subject. You certainly qualify. :-)

      • RE Watson Mar 14, 2014

        WOW ! You mention demented and BR, et al shows up. He just can’t help himself.

  • Randy Lucas Mar 14, 2014

    I wasn’t aware it was a “movement,” either. Professor Gallagher was though, absolutely correct. There were thousands of blacks, slaves and even free men of color, who supported and assisted the Confederate forces, performing crucial military functions necessary to keep the armies in the field. Were they enlisted men in the line of battle? Clearly, no. Were they essential to the Confederate war effort? Absolutely. Are they largely ignored for their service, courage, endurance and sacrifices? Absolutely. They deserve to be studied and their stories told instead of, as the Professor said, “airbrushed out of history.” The Civil War was just as much their war as all the others who served and sacrificed.

    • Kevin Levin Mar 16, 2014

      Not so much airbrushed but distorted by many, especially the Confederate heritage crowd. You are correct, they were essential to the Confederate war effort. The Confederacy was forced to mobilize as much of it’s slave population as possible.

      • Randy Lucas Mar 16, 2014

        Airbrushed was Professor Gallagher’s word. I think it appropriate. While one side seeks to inflate their impact, making them frontline troops, the other seeks to marginalize them into nonexistence. Both sides appear to be driven by some modern agenda rather than giving these men the study they so richly deserve. Without the contributions of blacks, slave and free, alike, the Confederate armies would not have been able to remain in the field. They deserve to be studied and their stories told.

        • Kevin Levin Mar 16, 2014

          I certainly have not ignored these men. I’ve written two articles that have been published in Civil War Times and The Civil War Monitor. One is a survey about the wartime experiences of camp servants and their relationship with Confederate officers. The second was a much needed correction to the widely distorted story of Silas and Andrew Chandler.

          • Bryan Cheeseboro Mar 16, 2014

            “Distorted” is a good way to explain how many people today remember the presence of slaves used by the Confederate military: as if they were actually soldiers who volunteered and were embraced as comrades by White men. But when I watch a movie like “Gettysburg” and see the scene of the Confederate camp (when Harrison reports to General Longstreet) and see no Blacks at all, that’s definitely “airbrushed out.”

  • Al Mackey Mar 16, 2014

    I normally agree with Gary Gallagher, and this is no exception to that. I think he’s exactly right regarding the black confederate myth. I’m not sure what he means regarding slaves with the confederate armies being airbrushed. Maybe he’s talking about black confederate mythologists trying to turn them into soldiers. Bell I. Wiley had a great book on blacks in the south, called Southern Negroes, 1861-1865, which was his first book and came out of his Ph.D. dissertation, that talked about the tens of thousands of slaves that were with confederate armies. Maybe Prof. Gallagher’s point is that other historians have ignored them in favor of telling soldier stories. I don’t know of any historians who have denied there were tens of thousands of slaves with the confederate armies.

    • Kevin Levin Mar 16, 2014

      I think his point was that we’ve overlooked the actual roles that slaves played in the various Confederate armies during the war.

Leave a Comment