Well, I just finished reading through the page proofs for my Crater book. Now all that stands between me and a finished book is the index. I have the formatting guidelines in front of me, but I would love to know what is the best way to proceed from those of you who have done this before. I was going to take the traditional route and use index cards. One index card for each term and place them in alphabetical order. Seems simple enough. The only thing I would have to worry about is a surprise visit from Felix or Jeb.
This is likely the last time I will ask my readers for assistance with this project so thanks a bunch. I assure you that if I thought there was anything glamorous about publishing a book before this week it is a distant memory. Why exactly did I put myself through this?
To commemorate the sesquicentennial of the Civil War and Emancipation, the Gilder Lehrman Center’s 2012 David Brion Davis Lectures on the History of Slavery, Race, and Their Legacies features a roundtable discussion with five major historians and writers, moderated by GLC Director, David W. Blight. The group takes up questions of the changing character and controversies over the memory of the Civil War and Emancipation over the past 150 years, as well as dwell on the place of the conflict’s legacies in our own time, nationally and internationally.
The wholesale tendency to dismiss Confederate accounts is inexcusable, Krick said. He blasted critics who hold that Confederate memoirs are full of historical errors. “Most of them were trying to tell the truth,” he said of veterans who penned recollections of their wartime experiences.
It goes without saying, that I can’t think of one historian who dismisses out of hand an entire collection of sources simply on the grounds that they were written after the fact. This is just another straw man argument. That said, I do agree with Krick that veterans were motivated to tell a truthful story about their wartime experiences. That, however, does not mean that their accounts were not influenced by other factors as well. I assume that most of you will agree that it is the historians responsibility to interrogate all sources for their veracity.
In my own research on the Crater and historical memory I found it helpful to think about individual accounts as reflecting what he/she believed to be meaningful to record rather than what was believed to be truthful. In the case of Confederate accounts, for example, the presence of black soldiers was a salient aspect of the battle that was included in the overwhelming number of letters and diaries. That clearly changed during the postwar years and I do my best to explain why.
So, why am I so excited about Brian’s blog? First and foremost, Brian is a rising star in the field. He has already published one book on South Mountain and historical memory as well as a number of journal articles. I first met Brian last year at North Carolina State University, where the two of us served on a panel on public history and memory. He is also an incredibly nice guy, but this is not why I am excited about Brian’s blog.
I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard stories of young scholars who are discouraged from embracing the world of social media, including blogging. I suspect that this can be explained, in part, by a certain level of anxiety from those individuals who feel alienated and left behind. Others have expressed legitimate concerns about the value of such endeavors in an academic culture that continues to struggle assigning objective value for purposes of hiring and promotion. Thankfully, this attitude is beginning to change.
As far as I know, Brian’s is the first blog written by a current graduate student with a focus in Civil War history. His dissertation is tentatively titled When Billy Came Marching Home: Union Veterans and Their Unending Civil War and will address a number of questions related to the challenges that veterans faced in keeping the nation focused on their sacrifice and accomplishments. Brian’s research has the potential to reach a very broad audience. We are likely to get an insider’s account as Brian explores and analyzes archival collections, relevant secondary sources, and the more abstract considerations that come with conceptual analysis. We need more of this.
If he keeps at it, Brian is likely to find that what at first glance appears to be a rather narrow/academic project will resonate among a very broad audience. His readers will not only be introduced to new primary and secondary sources, but new questions and methods for interrogating the past. Brian’s published work will be read and debated by academics and history enthusiasts alike. Most importantly, a vibrant blog site that reaches out and welcomes readers from diverse backgrounds will transform what it means to educate. I wish Brian all the best with his new digital project and I hope it encourages other young scholars in the field to matter more.
The first videos from Appomattox are being posted on the YouTube page of the Virginia Flaggers. In this short video members describe visitors and representatives of the Sons of Confederate Veterans as “scalawags” and “stink faces.” How very classy. Apparently, the SCV’s General Executive Committee issued a resolution requesting that all members boycott participating in the opening ceremonies. A few chose to participate. What I don’t understand is why the SCV didn’t encourage more to attend: more units, more flags. In fact, by the looks of it the MOC did nothing to prevent visitors from carrying Confederate flags on the grounds.
This protest reminds me of the situation in Lexington. In both cases no one is being prevented from waving a Confederate flag.