You may have noticed that I’ve made a few changes to the look of Civil War Memory. Actually, these changes go beyond simply moving back to a full-width framework and a transition to Arial as the main content font. Over the past few weeks I’ve slowly stripped the site of just about every plugin. While WordPress plugins add a great deal of functionality to your site the downside is quite often a slow load time, especially those associated with social networking sites. Another problem that I’ve encountered is that plugin authors are often slow to update their code with new versions of WordPress. Essentially, the installation of a plugin increases the number of external sites that your blog must rely on to load properly and quickly. I noticed this with DISQUS, which added a great deal of functionality to comments and allowed readers increased access to one another. Unfortunately, any problems on their end directly impacted the user experience, which is simply unacceptable. It sometimes felt like my blog was being held hostage.
I am now committed to locating as much of my blog’s functionality locally. I’ve gone from 20 to 6 plugins over the past few weeks, the remainder of which include: Akismet (spam), Get Recent Comments, Popular Posts, Post-Plugin Library, Recent Posts, and Subscribe to Comments. Functionality related to SEO is built into Thesis Theme, which is my theme of choice and ought to be yours as well. As you can see I’ve ditched those plugins that expand the blog’s social networking reach. The Share This plugin is gone as is Follow Me which was hidden away on the right side of the screen. In addition, I’ve nixed all of the code for such sites as FriendFeed and LibraryThing. This has forced me to learn a bit of php and css language, which I’ve thoroughly enjoyed. If you’ve experienced very brief downtime over the past few weeks that’s me crashing the site with some idiotic mistake with the code. Luckily, it’s very easy to correct. I still need to figure out a way to bring back the Facebook Community badge as well as a Twitter feed. Again, the only way I will do it is without a plugin.
Last month I was honored to be asked by an editor at the Wilson Quarterly to respond to an essay by Christopher Clausen. I was given roughly a 300-400 word limit, which didn’t give me room to go into much detail so I decided to offer a few words about one particular passage that I thought was worth a response. Regular readers of this blog probably will not see much of anything that is new in terms of my own thinking about this subject. You can now read Clausen’s essay on the WQ website. Here is my response, which will appear in the next issue:
Christopher Clausen’s article [America’s Changeable Civil War,” Spring 2010] offers a helpful overview of the influence that the Lost Cause and the broader trend of national reunion exercised on the nation’s collective memory through the Civil Rights Movement. Few will deny that the tendency to ignore the role of slavery and emancipation as crucial aspects of Civil War history and public remembrance were exposed as Americans were confronted with images of bus boycotts, “Freedom Rides,” and marches. While the nation confronted its “most ignominious legacy” through legislation it did not significantly alter the nation’s Civil War memory. However, much has changed over the past forty years, which may give us pause in accepting Clausen’s assumption that “what was actually won and lost [in the Civil War] is less settled than you might expect after 150 years.”
The election of Barack Obama has opened up numerous opportunities to discuss the history and legacy of slavery and race and our understanding of the Civil War specifically. In 2009 the president was petitioned to discontinue sending a wreath to the Confederate monument at Arlington National Cemetery – a monument that glorifies the Lost Cause with images of “loyal slaves” and an emphasis on states rights. Rather than incite further controversy, President Obama chose to send an additional wreath to the African American Soldier’s Memorial, which celebrates the history of United States Colored Troops. Those states that have organized Civil War Sesquicentennial commissions are choosing to emphasize the “Emancipationist Legacy” of the Civil War, including Virginia, which will hold a day-long symposium in September 2010 on slavery and emancipation.
It is a sad day for the teaching of American history in Texas. Unfortunately, we have a system that allows a dentist and others without any qualifications whatsoever to rewrite American history in a way that satisfies their own agenda. Fortunately, they’ve been honest about that agenda from the beginning. In the end, the state Board of Education failed to understand the difference between interpreting the crucial role that religion has played in American history and using history to advocate for a Christian world view.
Glad to see that everyone had some fun with the Clyde Wilson quiz. While the list as a whole serves as a case study of how not to frame historical questions, the one I have the most trouble with comes at the very end. Of course, it is true that President Obama is most commonly compared with Abraham Lincoln. Obama himself encouraged these comparisons from the beginning when he announced his candidacy for the presidency on the steps of the old statehouse in Springfield, Illinois. However, if I were a libertarian, paleoconservative, or just plain old neo-conservative I would object to such a comparison. If it’s the amount of government oversight and intrusiveness that is being measured than I would argue that the proper comparison is with Jefferson Davis.
The ensuing expansion of state capacity and intrusiveness of the policies adopted by the C.S.A. can hardly be exaggerated. Historians have been consistently struck, by the irony for sure–this was a republic erected on the principles of states rights, after all–but also by the sheer scale of the state-building project undertaken. It has been called a “revolutionary experience,” even an example of “state socialism.” In terms of central state structure and policies, and especially mobilization of national material and human resources, the C.S.A. was far more statist and modern than their counterpart in the Union, almost futuristic” in its assumption of central state power. Indeed, so “well organized and powerful” was the Confederacy, one historian has argued, that the United States would not see a central government with comparable authority until the emergence of the New Deal. (p. 153)
Here’s a nice little Lost Cause tune for ya’ all. I especially love the following lyric from the beginning of the song: “It’s not founded on old politics or race or slavery. Those who see no more than that care not for history.” For some reason poor old Braxton Bragg gets the back of the hand in this tune. Enjoy.