is going to blow a gasket when he sees this. Enjoy Dimitri.
We haven’t heard from our favorite “colored Confederate” researcher in quite some time, but it looks like Earl Ijames will be taking part in an upcoming conference on United States Colored Troops in New Bern, North Carolina. The conference is being sponsored by the New Bern Historical Society and runs from May 6-9. The conference is free and open to the general public. Interestingly, Mr. Ijames will speak as part of a session on “The Myth of Black Confederates”. I have no idea why a session on this subject would be included in a conference on USCTs. I would love to attend, but unfortunately, this is a pretty busy time of year for me at school.
It would be great if someone could attend and take notes and/or audio of his presentation. We have notes and audio from Mr. Ijames’s last presentation in Savannah, Georgia in which you can read and listen to some of the most incoherent claims made about this complex and widely misunderstood subject. With the help of numerous people we’ve been able to discredit much of Mr. Ijames’s research on a case-by-case basis on this site. I am curious as to what he will say about Weary Clyburn and John Venable. [For a sense of just how irresponsible Ijames can be, check out the contradictory claims made about Clyburn.] Mr. Ijames is responsible for a number of dubious claims about this subject and has refused to publish anything based on his research even after over ten years working at both the North Carolina Department of Archives and History and North Carolina Museum of History. I am hoping that someone will be able to attend.
In the wake of Governor McDonnell’s amendment to his Confederate History Month Proclamation, representatives of the Sons of Confederate Veterans did their best to convince America that slavery and race have little or nothing to do with understanding the war. Actually, the SCV has no problem discussing these issues – in fact, they are obsessed with the subject – as long as they control the terms of the debate. As a result we are introduced to thousands of loyal black Confederate slaves and other distortions designed to redirect the conversation away from the central role that slavery played in the Confederate experience. A few days ago I suggested that the SCV’s preferred view of the past has been on the defensive for the past few years and is on a fast track to becoming completely irrelevant. The responses from SCV members that I received served to confirm this prediction.
Reading accounts of yesterday’s dedication ceremony of the Davis-Limber statue at Beauvoir points to the extent to which the SCV’s agenda has been minimized and forced to remain on ground that they maintain. The statue is a case study in SCV propaganda and outright bad history. The SCV has never been interested in Limber’s story; rather, he functions (as do “black Confederates”) to steer any discussion of the war and the Confederacy away from race and slavery. Here are a few choice quotes from the ceremony that make my point:
In the name of the Sons of Confederate Veterans of all the people of the south of all the people of good conscience and righteousness throughout the world, we dedicate this statue of Jefferson Davis. That it may stand as eternal testament to a duty well done. Well, in the south, we know it takes a family to raise a child, and that’s what Jefferson Davis was willing to do. — Chuck McMichael
This really humanizes Jefferson Davis, tells a story which isn’t really told very often,” said Bowling. There are two young children standing next to Davis with arms linked. One of the children was rescued by Davis’ wife during the war. Jim Limber, the black child being beaten up and pushed around by an older man, and she hopped out of the carriage and pushed him away and grabbed Jim Limber and took him home where he became a functional member of the Davis household. — Brag Bowling
As you can clearly see, this story has nothing at all to do with little Jim Limber. It’s about an act that was performed, not by Jefferson Davis, but by his wife, Varina. Why isn’t she featured in this statue? What is truly disturbing, however, is how little we know about Limber as well as the very brief period of time he spent with the Davis family. In William J. Cooper’s massive biography of Jefferson Davis we find not one reference to this boy, though the author spends a great deal of time discussing the Davis family. Joan Cashin’s recent biography of Varina Davis does include a few brief references to Limber, but it raises more questions than answers. She notes the incident in Richmond that led to Limber joining the household, but as to his place in the family Cashin suggests that he functioned as a “playmate” to the other children. In fact, it looks like it was Davis’s biological children who took a liking to the boy and pressed the issue of whether he could stay.
If the SCV wishes to be taken seriously than they should have no problem pointing us to the primary sources that support the claims that were made yesterday and at countless other times. [Oh…just in case you need to be reminded, Rickey Pittman’s book does not count as scholarship.]
I won’t hold my breadth because as I said this isn’t really about Jim Limber and, ultimately, it may not even be about the Davis family. Tell em’ Mr. Bowling:
“It wasn’t about slavery. It was about freedom, and the Jefferson Davis statue symbolizes freedom”
Apparently a number of my recent posts about Confederate History Month are making the rounds among members of the Sons of Confederate Veterans. This happens every once in a while and I end up having to deal with a sharp increase in silly comments and other personal insults. For the most part I am receiving the standard responses that rehash the same tired points about historical revisionism and a belief that their way of life and history are under siege. It’s impossible to respond to these claims, but I do find them instructive on a number of levels. You can have a look through the last few posts to decide for yourself.
I do want to make a few points clear. First and foremost, I don’t believe for a second that the members of the SCV have any kind of privileged status when it comes to commemorating and remembering the lives and service of Confederate soldiers. The accident of lineage is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for properly and accurately reflecting on the lives of these men as well as the event that played such a prominent role in their lives. While the SCV may wish to view the recent public backlash against Confederate History Month as a personal affront to their beliefs and on the lives of their ancestors there is no one group or individual that controls the past. As I’ve stated already, the response to Gov. Robert McDonnell’s proclamation had little to do with attacking the SCV; rather it was an assertion that the content of that document does not represent the views of a growing segment of the population. Nor does it represent good history. We would do well to remember that we are all foreigners in that place called history.
Yes, I have been quite critical of the SCV over the past few weeks, and at other points in the past, as have others. I will continue to point out dubious historical claims such as those contained in their Confederate History Month proclamations as well as other issues from the Davis-Limber controversy to the ridiculous stories of loyal Confederate slaves. My perspective on all of this stems from my work as a historian, educator, resident of the great state of Virginia, and as an American who cares about how we as a nation remember the past. That is my pass and that is all I need. I don’t need to be related directly to anyone connected to the Civil War to have a right to voice my beliefs/concerns and I will continue to do so.