I‘ve never quite understood the vehement anger expressed by some for Abraham Lincoln. Yes, I get the libertarian concern that Lincoln’s policies reflect a fundamental shift in the size and scope of the federal government. Funny that they rarely express the same concern for Jefferson Davis who went just as far in suspending civil liberties as well as increasing the size of the federal government in Richmond. More prevalent, however is the view that has been shaped by generations of white Southerners who see Lincoln as the man who unleashed the likes of Grant, Sherman, and Sheridan on an innocent southern populace that only wanted to be left alone to govern themselves and preserve their “way of life.” The agendas of both constituencies – one economic and the other emotional/scar-ridden – end up with an interpretation of Lincoln that resonates very little with me as a historian and as a citizen.
One of the first books I read when I first discovered the Civil War back in the mid-1990s was David Donald’s Lincoln. Lincoln had never appeared on my radar screen before, but he has occupied a central place in my reading on the war and nineteenth-century America ever since. I’ve devoured well over 100 books on Lincoln and even with everything I’ve read I can still read more. No other historical figure comes close to challenging my appetite for Lincoln studies. There were a number of things that stood out in those first few books that caught my attention. I was fascinated with his early life, his apparent ambition and concern for his own future, which revealed itself early on, and most importantly, his struggle with depression. At the time I was struggling with it myself along with a lack of direction in my life. I don’t remember learning anything about Lincoln’s personal life in high school, but this aspect of his personal profile struck a chord with me and perhaps even provided me with a little strength. In short, I felt I had a connection with the man.
That said, my interest in Lincoln has never come close to hero worship. The realm of history has never provided me with a forum for developing those kinds of connections. [The only person in my life who deserves that kind of respect and admiration is my own father.] Rather, I’ve embraced the study of history as an intellectual exercise, one that involves bringing to bear my limited analytical abilities and love for a good story. I am not trying to protect or defend a preferred interpretation of any one aspect of the past nor do I see it as a stage where good battles evil. Those who do “take sides” inevitably simplify and cherry pick their narrative to suit their own personal agenda. There is very little that I believe about the Civil War compared to when I first started reading about it fifteen years ago. I hope that fifteen years from now my understanding of Lincoln and the Civil War have progressed to a similar point. There is nothing sacred in my understanding of the past; it’s all open to reinterpretation and it is something that I actively pursue.
That being said, it would be dishonest to suggest that my view of Lincoln is entirely objective – whatever that might mean. In the end, I approve of the outcome of the war, including Lincoln’s decision as commander-in-chief to begin the process of emancipation, which eventually led to the end of slavery. That said, I am under no illusions regarding Lincoln’s racial outlook, though I am struck by the difficulty of so many in distinguishing between his moral view and the specific policies he supported as president during a civil war.
More importantly, however, my outlook on Lincoln and the war stems from my pride as a citizen of this country. The union that Lincoln helped preserve is the nation that I live in and call home. I must assume that this is what undergirds most people’s understanding of Lincoln at some level. With this in mind, it seems strange to ask why Jefferson Davis or Robert E. Lee’s recent bicentennial failed to attract the same level of enthusiasm around the country. Even in the South you will find plenty of programs to honor the memory of Lincoln throughout the remainder of this year. If we accept the assumption that the South is one of the more patriotic regions of this country than it should come as no surprise that Lincoln’s life and legacy would be honored this year. The bicentennial celebrations of Lincoln seem fitting as a celebration of the history of this great nation, even if I tend to look on more as an observer rather than as a participant when it comes to its more emotional and hagiographic moments.
For me, Abraham Lincoln will always be a subject open to further study and contemplation as well as the president who helped bring an end to slavery and worked to secure the future of this nation – warts and all. And yes, I find myself falling deeply in love with the man.
So, it looks like I am reviewing John F. Schmutz’s new book on the Crater for H-Net. I should apologize for the cheap shot I took the other week when I suggested that he probably took up the project after watching Cold Mountain. It turns out he has some relatives who fought in the battle. Schmutz has written a thick book, and apparently he did a pretty good job of surveying the primary and secondary sources. It’s also nice to see some of my own published work on the Crater in recent bibliographies, including his. Still, I am a bit concerned after reading the preface. The author describes the political scene in the 1860s with the phrase, “political correctness run amok.” Hell, I don’t even know what the phrase means most of the time when it is used to describe current politics, let alone the political culture 140 years ago. Anyway, I will let you know what I think once I’ve crawled out of this thing.
I‘ve got 55 exams to grade as well as end-of-the-trimester comments to write over the next few days. But for now I am enjoying the final projects from my students who spent this past trimester studying Civil War Memory. This was one of the most rewarding experiences for me to date. I had a wonderful group of motivated and curious students who thoroughly embraced the subject and who pushed me every step of the way. For their final projects I gave them a wide range of options, but encouraged them to come up with their own ideas. I wanted them to reflect a bit more on some aspect of the course or contribute in some way to the memory of the war. In the end, their projects covered a broad spectrum. One student analyzed the song, “The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down” by The Band, while another student did a thorough analysis of the Dixie Outfitters website. Two groups of students made documentaries based on our trip to Richmond while another group did a survey of the school community on issues related to the Civil War and memory. Two students chose to reflect on how their own memory of the war has evolved over the course of the trimester. They were quite moving and attest to the continued influence of the Civil War on even the youngest generation. A couple of students chose to write their own commemorative speeches on some aspect of the war; they were accompanied by slides to give the audience a sense of time and place. The photos below constitute just a small sample of what was done.
One student decided to do a couple of sculptures. The one pictured above is titled, “Confederate Bushwhacker Hides from Pro-Union Jayhawker.” Two students sketched their own idea for a Civil War monument accompanied by an essay which outlines its theme and purpose. The first one is titled, “Battle of the Wilderness, May 5th -7th, 1864.” Here is a brief excerpt from this student’s essay:
The monument itself depicts Grant atop his horse with a soldier to his right and another flanking his left side. The horse is slightly prancing, made nervous by the commotion, fire, and lack of visibility. Grant sits erect, holding his hat behind him to urge his men to keep moving forward. There is a bush both directly in front and behind the monument, again giving the sense that these soldiers were fighting in a thicket and had to maneuver around such obstacles. Their muskets are raised, ready to fire, and their bayonets are in place and ready for the hand-to-hand combat and bloody fighting that they faced. The monument is dedicated to the remembrance of Grant and his army, especially the soldiers that sacrificed themselves to make the necessary push forward against Lee’s army, leading the Union to victory.
The next sketch is titled, “Unification, After the War” and features Lincoln, Lee, and a soldier in the 54th Massachusetts:
In the center, President Abraham Lincoln stands strong and composed. He is dressed in his dignified black suit along with his unmistakably famous top hat. I included Lincoln in my monument because he is the reason why the United States survived and was unified after the Civil War. Before the war, Lincoln stated that, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.” Therefore, he stands in the middle of General Robert E. Lee and a soldier in the 54th Massachusetts Regiment to emphasize just how right he was. General is placed to Lincoln’s right on my monument. He was the heart of the Confederate Army and fought bravely for the South. His placement besides Lincoln represents the unification of both sides after the war in 1865. To the left of Lincoln I placed a brave soldier from the 54th Massachusetts commanded by Colonel Robert G. Shaw. This soldier symbolizes the start of change in America after the war. Even though laws were not equal for black Americans after the war, victory for the North was the beginning of the transformation of the United States….This monument symbolizes the rebuilding of the United States of America after the war. Each man represented on this monument had a part in this war; therefore they are equally commemorated on it.
I’ve got some ideas about how I can improve the class if I choose to offer it next year. For one, I would like to make it much more hands on for students and allow them to work on more detailed projects. My guess is that this is the first high school elective ever offered on the Civil War and memory. Now that’s pretty cool.
My friend and fellow historian, Karen Cox, has issued a call for papers for a proposed collection of essays on tourism in the American South. Karen already has a number of historians involved in this project, including yours truly. I am going to contribute an essay on Arlington House and the evolution of the NPS’s discussion of slavery on the grounds. Over the past few years I’ve collected some information on this subject so it will be nice to be able to finally do something with it. Karen is already in contact with a publisher and has been given an advanced contract so it is likely that the collection will see the light of day. What follows is the CFP as well as Karen’s contact info. if you are interested. [oh...and I stole the image from K's Facebook page.]
This is an invitation to submit proposals for essays to join others in a book (now under advance contract) that explores historical tourism in the American South. Historic sites, for the purposes of this volume, are those places that have been restored and/or adapted for the purpose of preserving some aspect of southern history and interpreting that history to the public. This volume will be divided into four sections each exploring a different aspect of tourism to sites of southern history and memory and proposals should fit into one of the following categories:
People and Places: will examine individual southerners and the historic sites preserved to tell their story.
War and Remembrance: will examine Revolutionary, Civil War, Spanish-American sites in the region.
Race and Slavery: will examine historic sites that interpret slavery or civil rights.
Landscape and Memory: will examine tourist sites that are concerned with the physical environment. Suggestions include cemeteries, Rock City, the Virginia’s Natural Bridge or the Florida Everglades.
Final essays will be 20-25 pages in length and will be accompanied by illustrations.
For consideration, please send a brief CV and a 1-page abstract by April 1, 2009 describing your topic to: Karen L. Cox, Editor, Department of History, UNC Charlotte, firstname.lastname@example.org