Check out the excellent video that Caitlin, from Vast Public Indifference, put together in response to one of my recent posts on Civil War art. Caitlin’s commentary begins around 2:10. The video is here, but I encourage you to read her full post, which includes another video. Does anyone really believe that the images in this video reflect how white Virginians lived? More to the point, do people who fall into the demographic of those who are attracted to this “maudlin crapfest” actually believe that this reflects how they would have lived in antebellum Virginia? Even a cursory understanding of Virginia’s antebellum history demonstrates that many believed the commonwealth was headed in the wrong direction [click here and here]. Can we do no better than yearn for a return to a time when slavery was accepted? Such nostalgic silliness is nothing less than a yearning to return to slavery.
I am going to show this to my Civil War Memory class tomorrow. They are currently working on their final projects and a number of them are putting together videos from our trip to Richmond as well as collections of various images related to memory. Well done, Caitlin.
Update: Check out the obligatory response from Richard Williams who can’t think of anything more interesting to say other than to accuse us of South bashing [blah, blah, blah]. Do you really find the history of the Confederacy and the antebellum South in these images? Scary and just a little disturbing – no offense.
The Sons of Confederate Veterans is still trying to find a home for their statue of Jefferson Davis and Jim Limber. The statue, which cost $100,000, was originally planned for the grounds at Tredegar in Richmond next to the statue of Lincoln and his son Tad. The American Civil War Museum accepted the statue, but made no promises as to whether it would be displayed and how. Apparently, the SCV doesn’t know the first thing about how museums operate. Now they are offering the statue to the state of Mississippi. Good luck boys, but in this political climate my guess is that you don’t have a chance. My offer still stands to use it in my classroom as an interpretive piece to help my students better understand the continued influence of the Lost Cause. What do you say? We will take very good care of it.
Between the statue, their big ass Confederate flags flying over Southern highways, and their endorsement of a NASCAR driver, the SCV has demonstrated their commitment to wasting money and their inability to take Southern heritage seriously.
Some of you have no doubt read the colorful comment left by a reader who refers to herself as “JosephineSouthern.” Here is a short excerpt:
Oh how trashy you are. You have no sense of decency or honor. If you did you would know in your heart of hearts that what Grant did to VICKSBURG was atrocious evil. Shame on them and Shame on the USA. War on women and children, Grant and Butler the Beast I would spit on today! It is obvious your people didn’t suffer and die through Lincoln’s War and afterwards. So what do you care. We tried getting along with you people, but you just won’t let us.
You may be surprised to learn that I receive these types of comments quite frequently. Most of them never see the light of day and end up being deleted. Still, regardless of the content it’s not easy to hit the delete button. After all, this is a site where interested readers can explore the way in which the Civil War has been commemorated and remembered as well as its continued hold on our culture. Many of the comments left on this site reflect this continued interest and influence. Without getting to meta on you, I would like to think that this site itself has become a window into the rich legacy of Civil War memory. Perhaps at some point in the future researchers will peruse this site’s archives to analyze how various subjects were analyzed by me as well as the response from a broad audience.
At times it is necessary to delete comments and even ban readers entirely to maintain a certain level of discourse. I’ve thought about creating a page where I could isolate comments such as the one above. It is a comprise, however, as this would preserve the comment but remove it from the life of the blog post. There is an argument for maintaining uncensored discourse on a site such as this. Finally, I also make it a point to double-check the links which you provide in the comment form. I maintain the right to delete links that I believe provide false or misleading information. Again, the same concerns apply.
I would love to know what you think. What are the alternatives when trying to achieve the right balance between informed/mature discourse and preserving the kind of site that will reflect our continued interest in the Civil War?