Museum of the Confederacy In Financial Trouble

Today’s Richmond Times-Dispatch reports the following:

The Museum and White House of the Confederacy, struggling financially for
several years, got more bad news yesterday with the General Assembly’s approval
of a two-year state budget. The museum would receive just $50,000 of a $700,000 grant the downtown
institution had requested for fiscal 2006-08.  "We anticipated a one-time grant to help us temporarily sustain our operation
and allow us to plan a more financially secure future," said Carlton P. Moffat
Jr., chairman of the museum’s board of trustees. "We are disappointed that the
state chose not to grant the majority of our request.  The money was to have been used to reverse the museum’s deficit, expected to
reach $500,000 this year, and for planning.

Behind their financial concerns the museum has contemplated moving, along with the White House of the Confederacy, to a more accessible location. 

Visitation at the White House, a National Historic Landmark, has declined
steadily from a high of 92,000 in the early 1990s to about 55,000. One problem
is that the museum’s small campus near 12th and East Clay streets has been
nearly crushed amid expansion of Virginia Commonwealth University’s medical

I sincerely hope that the museum and the city can work through these issues.  The museum holds a wealth of valuable artifacts and documents, and their recent exhibits clearly reflect a willingness to consider controversial topics that are all too often ignored. As a historian and teacher I would hate to see us lose all of this.

Searching for Black Confederates: The Civil War’s Most Persistent Myth

“Levin’s study is the first of its kind to blueprint and then debunk the mythology of enslaved African Americans who allegedly served voluntarily in behalf of the Confederacy.”–Journal of Southern History

Purchase your copy today!

2 comments… add one
  • Kevin Levin Jun 24, 2006 @ 7:26

    I guess that is a possibility, but you may have overestimated the importance that these groups attach to the MOC. The MOC does not present a sanitized view of the Confederacy, but continues to challenge the way we think about, among other things, slavery, black Confederates, and women. John Coski, who is in charge of the MOC’s library recently published a well-received book on the Confederate flag which challenges the naieve view that it is a benign symbol that should be reduced simply as the flag that was carried into battle by Confederate soldiers. Finally, and I may be wrong about this, but it is hard to imagine that these groups have the kinds of funds that would make a dent in the MOC’s financial problems.

  • elementaryhistoryteacher Jun 23, 2006 @ 22:33

    Perhaps they could secure funds from the various chapters of the Daughters and Sons of the Confederacy. It would seem that those groups would not want to loose these places either.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *