New Lincoln Letter: Who Cares

by Kevin Levin on June 8, 2007 · 3 comments · Follow me on

in Uncategorized

Lletter Can someone please explain to me why the emergence of this new Lincoln document is so important.  This morning it even showed up as a news item on AOL News.  The letter tells us nothing new and I assume that this isn’t the first Lincoln letter uncovered in recent years.  I would love to know how this story took off and spread so quickly.  Listening to both Brian Williams of NBC and Katie Couric of CBS mention Lincoln, Gettysburg, and Robert E. Lee sounded so surreal to me and I can’t quite explain why. 


Get a Signed Copy of My Book ($25 Direct From Author)

"In this stunning and well-researched book, Kevin Levin catches the new waves of the study of memory, black soldiers, and the darker underside of the Civil War as well as anyone has... Levin is both superb scholar and public historian, showing us a piece of the real war that does now get into the books, as well as into site interpretation."

David Blight, Author of Race and Reunion

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

Brooks Simpson June 8, 2007 at 11:17 am 1

The document is interesting primarily as artifact, as Halleck passed the message along to Meade, and it’s in that form that people know about it (and have for some time). The National Archives did an excellent job of manipulating thre media to get maximum exposure. Then again, we had the same issue several months back when various archivists discovered letters from Lincoln seeming to sanction the ratification of the original 13th Amendment protecting slavery. The letters were simply cover letters of transmission, but some people made a big thing of this.

You would think that with all the books on Lincoln that someone would read them. :)

Reply

Clio Bluestocking June 8, 2007 at 11:34 am 2

But…but…it’s Lincoln!!1!11!!

Seriously, what has me curious about this story is how the document was “lost” and then “found.” Was it just misfiled? If scholars have know this letter existed (as the Washington Post reported) then why is it considered new? How did the archivist who found it know that is was “new”? And, again, why the big deal? Is this a publicity stunt to get funding for something?

Reply

Bruce Miller June 8, 2007 at 12:10 pm 3

And when these stories went out, it must have been at least a couple of hours since there was anything new on Paris Hilton…

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: