Michael Burlingame on Abraham Lincoln

by Kevin Levin on April 30, 2009 · 6 comments · Follow me on

in Civil War Historians

Of course, most of you know that Burlingame recently published his massive 2-volume study of Abraham Lincoln.  This talk was recorded at Illinois College on March 26, 2009.  Click through the video to get the rest of his talk.  In part 3 Burlingame suggests that Lincoln was assassinated by John W. Booth as a result of his suggestion that some blacks should be given the right to vote.  He goes on to suggest that Lincoln’s assassiantion should be understood as part of a larger narrative that includes Martin L. King, Medgar Evers, Michael Schwermer and other civil rights advocates.  I think he is right about the first point, but I’m not sure I buy the second.  Regardless, Burlingame is one of the more thoughtful Lincoln scholars and you are sure to learn something.


Get a Signed Copy of My Book ($25 Direct From Author)

"In this stunning and well-researched book, Kevin Levin catches the new waves of the study of memory, black soldiers, and the darker underside of the Civil War as well as anyone has... Levin is both superb scholar and public historian, showing us a piece of the real war that does now get into the books, as well as into site interpretation."

David Blight, Author of Race and Reunion

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

Dan Wright April 30, 2009 at 11:48 am 1

Kevin:
I’ve really enjoyed your blog this week. Great work.
The Burlingame video was a nice bonus.

Reply

Kevin Levin April 30, 2009 at 11:51 am 2

Thanks Dan. Glad to hear it.

Reply

Brooks Simpson May 3, 2009 at 3:09 pm 3

Michael’s point (which I’ve heard before) is that Booth expressly murdered Lincoln because of Lincoln’s April 11, 1865 address in which he advocated limited black suffrage. He did not kill him because of winning the war or even for his role in destroying slavery.

Now, whether you buy that or not is up to you. But I must say that it makes some sense to me.

Reply

Kevin Levin May 3, 2009 at 4:15 pm 4

Brooks,

It definitely makes sense to me, though I have some difficulty with the broader interpretive claim that situates Lincoln with King, Schwermer, etc.

Reply

Jim Buie May 5, 2009 at 1:31 pm 5

Tried to give this post a trackback, as I link to it in my post about Burlingame’s inspiring and concluding paragraph on Lincoln. I also link to a story about Burlingame’s visit to Bennett Place in Durham, NC, where the Civil War actually ended, not Appomattox as is commonly believed. Thanks for your post. I’ll continue to check out your interesting blog.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: