Why Gender Matters to the Civil War

by Kevin Levin on September 26, 2010 · 4 comments · Follow me on

in Civil War Historians


Get a Signed Copy of My Book ($25 Direct From Author)

"In this stunning and well-researched book, Kevin Levin catches the new waves of the study of memory, black soldiers, and the darker underside of the Civil War as well as anyone has... Levin is both superb scholar and public historian, showing us a piece of the real war that does now get into the books, as well as into site interpretation."

David Blight, Author of Race and Reunion

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Dick Stanley September 27, 2010 at 9:41 am 1

Wonderful, Kevin. Thanks. I’d never really thought about the condition of Northern women during the war and how the government undermined their post-war contribution by building/maintaining cemeteries and memorials, whereas Southern women had to do those things themselves.

Reply

Andy Hall September 27, 2010 at 11:53 am 2

You’d enjoy Drew Gilpin Faust’s This Republic of Suffering,” which deals extensively with the establishment of cemeteries, North and South.

Reply

Marianne Davis September 27, 2010 at 1:14 pm 3

I had some technical problems with this one, but I wonder if this lecture was not a precis of her fascinating book “Gender and the Sectional Conflict.” While we all might cavil with “Sectional Conflict,” Silber makes a strong case for the difference between Northern and Southern white men in the way they thought of home. She also stressed that the”Yankee pledge to public schools” had given Northern women a different view of themselves.
But ultiately, it’s the same old story. Women, like men, have long been called upon to meet difficult situations. Both men and women have survived appalling privation. The difference between the genders is that people continue to be surprised when women do so. Remember too, that just as the USCTs had to have white officers, the Sanitary Commission had to be directed by men. The women of the Civil War seem to have been like the Women’s Land Army in Britain or our own Rosie the Riveters. They rose to the occasion and then, no longer needed, returned to being somewhat troublesome flowers.

Reply

Kevin Levin September 27, 2010 at 1:19 pm 4

It is to a certain extent. The book you reference is based on a series of lectures she did at Penn State a few years ago. It goes without saying that her scholarship goes much further than the content of this lecture.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: