“The Geography of Emancipation”

by Kevin Levin on November 12, 2010 · 9 comments · Follow me on

2 Flares 2 Flares ×

I was unable to attend the most recent biennial meeting of the Society of Civil War Historians back in June so I missed the keynote address by Gary Gallagher and Ed Ayers.  Luckily, C-SPAN was there and recorded the entire session.  I am particularly interested in Gallagher’s talk since it encompasses much of what will be included in his forthcoming book, The Union War.  Gallagher argues that the role of Union forces must be acknowledged in any attempt to understand the progress of emancipation during the war.  In doing so he challenges the self-emancipation thesis as well as the more popular image of Lincoln as the “great emancipator.”  Here is a short clip of Gallagher’s talk while you can find the entire session here.

2 Flares Twitter 2 Facebook 0 Google+ 0 2 Flares ×


Get a Signed Copy of My Book ($25 Direct From Author)

"In this stunning and well-researched book, Kevin Levin catches the new waves of the study of memory, black soldiers, and the darker underside of the Civil War as well as anyone has... Levin is both superb scholar and public historian, showing us a piece of the real war that does now get into the books, as well as into site interpretation."

David Blight, Author of Race and Reunion

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

Marc Ferguson November 12, 2010 at 12:23 pm 1

This looks good, and I will have to watch the entire talk. To say that the role of the Union army has to be acknowledged is, to me, a vast understatement. In teaching emancipation, I frame the entire topic around the movement of Union armies, encountering and confronting slaves and slavery, and the problems this poses for the military as well as the opportunities presented to slaves, as fundamental to the entire process. A time-frame map showing the progress of Union armies illustrates this well.

Reply

Mike Musick November 12, 2010 at 1:08 pm 2

I would suggest that there was at least one exception to the racial attitudes of mid-nineteenth century American whites which Gary, in his splendid presentation, sees as universal. That exception was John Brown. Nowhere in my readings on the man have I encountered reference to a time when he did not practice a species of equality that was virtually non-existent among others, and that won him the love of the black community to this day.

Reply

Kevin Levin November 12, 2010 at 1:23 pm 3

You make a good point. Brown’s exceptionalism is clearly analyzed in David S. Reynolds’s recent biography. Although I don’t entirely agree with her thesis I found it interesting that Gallagher didn’t cite Chandra Manning’s work on Civil War soldiers.

Reply

James Harrigan November 8, 2011 at 8:50 am 4

Kevin, in Gallagher’s “Union War” he makes his disdain for Chandra Manning’s work very clear .

Reply

Kevin Levin November 8, 2011 at 8:53 am 5

I think “disdain” is a bit too strong, but he clearly disagrees with her conclusions.

Reply

Wilbur November 13, 2010 at 6:30 am 6

Thanks for posting this- very interesting. I’m off to watch the rest of it on C-span right away.

Reply

Kevin Levin November 13, 2010 at 6:51 am 7

You are quite welcome. The last time I checked there seems to be something wrong with the full video.

Reply

Wilbur November 13, 2010 at 8:15 am 8

There was at first, got it to work though….. if it’s working here in Australia it’ll probably be O.K. there now (or soon)!
The link made by Gallagher between USCT recruitment and states where the U.S. Army had a presence was fascinating. It’s kind of obvious, in retrospect, but I had never actually considered it before.

Reply

Bailey November 15, 2010 at 12:00 pm 9

I think Gov. Chase of Ohio, had an idea of equality that matched Browns.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: