Post image for Debating Emancipation on C-SPAN

Debating Emancipation on C-SPAN

by Kevin Levin on September 24, 2012 · 8 comments · Follow me on

in Civil War Culture, Civil War Historians, Slavery

Over the weekend C-SPAN televised a panel on emancipation that took place over the summer as part of the Civil War Institute.  Pete Carmichael was kind enough to invite me to take part on this particular panel, though I have to admit that I felt a bit out of place next to my colleagues.  The other panelists included Keith Harris, Anne Marshall, Glenn D. Brasher, and Craig Symonds.

My friends at the SHPG were so excited about my first C-SPAN appearance that one member decided to create a short clip of just me.  Apparently, my emphasis on the importance of acknowledging northern racism is news. I couldn’t ask for more loyal support and I thank them for it.

I do hope C-SPAN plans on televising the CWI panel on blogging, which also included Harris and Brooks Simpson.  Finally, I do want to pass along news of Louis Masur’s new book, which explores the hundred days between Lincoln’s preliminary and final emancipation proclamation.  I am about half-way through and enjoying it.


Get a Signed Copy of My Book ($25 Direct From Author)

"In this stunning and well-researched book, Kevin Levin catches the new waves of the study of memory, black soldiers, and the darker underside of the Civil War as well as anyone has... Levin is both superb scholar and public historian, showing us a piece of the real war that does now get into the books, as well as into site interpretation."

David Blight, Author of Race and Reunion

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

Andy Hall September 24, 2012 at 5:53 am 1

Apparently, my emphasis on acknowledging northern racism is news.

This even may herald a new era in which the True Southrons actually listen to, and think about, what people with whom they disagree actually say and write, rather than huff and puff and fume about their supposed motivations and knock down straw men consisting of simplistic, absolutist arguments they never actually made.

Why are you laughing, Kevin? It could happen. . . .

Reply

Kevin Levin September 24, 2012 at 5:58 am 2

It’s funny, if you head over to my posts at the Atlantic the ones that focus on traditional Confederate topics attract scores of comments and outrage, but anything that waivers from it gets very little attention. Consider my post which questions how we remember the 54th Massachusetts and northern racism. These folks are masters at selective outrage.

I’ve been talking about these topics on this blog, in my classroom, and in history teacher workshops for years. :-)

Reply

Michael Aubrecht September 24, 2012 at 11:08 am 3

I watched the episode and enjoyed it very much. Well done Kevin.

Reply

Kevin Levin September 24, 2012 at 12:52 pm 4

Thanks.

Reply

Pat Young September 24, 2012 at 5:18 pm 5

Great panel.

Reply

GBrasher September 25, 2012 at 8:17 am 6

After further review, this discussion is slightly better than I think we all originally thought (despite the attempts by the moderator to drag it into deeper and murkier waters.) Nice work, Kevin. It cracks me up that the heritage folks felt it was somehow noteworthy that you discussed northern racism.

By the way, I like the new look on the website.

Reply

Kevin Levin September 25, 2012 at 8:44 am 7

I agree. We ended up with a pretty good discussion.

Thanks for the feedback re: the new design. The software that I use is scheduled for a major upgrade so expect more changes in the near future.

Reply

Lyle Smith September 25, 2012 at 10:24 am 8

Good discussion. You fit right in Kevin.

This isn’t germane, but I’m with Symonds on the importance of a war bringing about the end of slavery in the United States. There had to be some kind of violence to end slavery. Slavery was just too essential to the economy and culture of the South for Southerners to just let go of it freely.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: