Desertion and Coercion in a Confederate Company

The overarching question that is driving my book project about Captain John Christopher Winsmith is why a diehard Confederate officer from Spartanburg, South Carolina joined the Republican Party after the war and eventually advocated for Black civil rights. As I mentioned in a previous post, it is not just Christopher who made this transition, but his father as well.

Of course, there are plenty of topics to explore related to his military career in Company H of the First South Carolina regiment. A strong sense of Confederate nationalism pervades the letter right through to his wounding at Fort Harrison in September 1864. Christopher was also accompanied by numerous body servants or camp slaves while with the army. [This is something that I should have explored in much more detail in Searching for Black Confederates.]

That said, it is his relationship with his father during the war that fascinates me. They corresponded regularly and formed almost a partnership of sorts. John Winsmith, Sr. was very likely involved in the formation of his son’s company in the spring of 1862. He also attempted and failed in using his political clout as a state legislator to secure a promotion for Christopher.

It is unfortunate that the father’s letters do not survive, but it is possible to reconstruct some of their correspondence based on Christopher’s letters alone.

One of the most important thing about this father-son partnership is the way they both worked to curb desertion in Christopher’s unit. His letters are filled with the names of men who deserted at some point during the war. Many of these names can be found in multiple letters. The father role was to round these men up and send them back to the army. I have little doubt that he took whatever steps necessary to publicize individual names to exert sufficient pressure to force them back.

I plan on mapping all the names referenced in these letters to see where they lived in proximity to the Winsmith family.

Christopher believed that every soldier had the obligation to do his part for the Confederate cause. He was convinced that if everyone did his duty the Confederacy would achieve its independence. A strong sense of nationalism, hatred of the Yankees, and fear of emancipation underlay Christopher’s commitment to the Confederacy, but the letters make it clear that what maintained discipline was COERCION.

Christopher makes no attempt to understand the complicated reasons for desertion, even among those individuals that he likely had some contact with before the war. He supported harsh punishments for these men, including execution as late as September 1864.

I would be interested to know whether the father-son team described above as a means to curb desertion was common among junior officers.

Christopher’s efforts in this regard point to the extent to which junior officers functioned to manage the men in his unit and their relationship with the home front. Attempting to control desertion represented one way in which the success of his company depended on balancing the needs of families and the level of sacrifice and discipline that Christopher expected of the men under his command.

About the author: Thank you for taking the time to read this post. What next? Scroll down and join the discussion in the comments section. Looking for more Civil War content? You can follow me on Twitter. Check out my latest book, Searching For Black Confederates: The Civil War’s Most Persistent Myth, which is the first book-length analysis of the black Confederate myth ever published. Order your copy today.

10 comments… add one
  • Robert Gudmestad Sep 10, 2020 @ 9:29

    You mentioned coercion as the main way that Winship enforced discipline in the company. I’m not surprised but could you provide a couple of examples from the letters?

  • Fergus M Bordewich Sep 5, 2020 @ 12:49

    Quite interesting. As you doubtless know, the Winships figure significantly in the investigation of KKK activity in South Carolina, a few years later — as victims.

    • Kevin Levin Sep 5, 2020 @ 12:51

      Yes. The father testified after the incident at his home. He was shot seven times and survived.

  • 65th NY Guy Sep 5, 2020 @ 7:10

    …and I am sure it will be a great book, having read Searching for Black Confederates, which was great.

    –Chris Barry

    • Kevin Levin Sep 5, 2020 @ 7:29

      Thanks for the kind words, Chris.

  • 65th NY Guy Sep 5, 2020 @ 7:09

    Sounds like a great project. Good luck with the writing process.

    –Chris Barry
    Author, No Flinching From Fire: the 65th New York Volunteers in the Civil War

  • David T. Dixon Sep 5, 2020 @ 6:05

    Kevin once you map the deserters it may be very fruitful to take a look at the records for his county in the Southern Claims Commission records. Suspect that at least some of those coerced were Union men and if you are fortunate you will find detailed testimony about them, their motives, and perhaps even some surprises about the Winsmiths. I have the published SCC index in case you need it and have trouble accessing it in the pandemic. Ancestry has an incomplete collection of these claims as does Fold 3

    • Kevin Levin Sep 5, 2020 @ 6:21

      I definitely plan on looking through the SCC. Thanks, David.

  • paineite Sep 5, 2020 @ 4:54

    Interesting story indeed and will follow with interest. Thanks.

    • Kevin Levin Sep 5, 2020 @ 6:22

      Thanks for the positive response.

Now that you've read the post, share your thoughts.